IVV

Prezzo iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

Closed
IVV
$740,97
+$6,08(+0,82%)

*Data last updated: 2026-05-10 01:54 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-05-10 01:54, iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is priced at $740,97, with a total market cap of $821,40B, a P/E ratio of 0,00, and a dividend yield of 0,00%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $678,59 and $741,67. The current price is 9,19% above the day's low and 0,09% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 2,78M. Over the past 52 weeks, IVV has traded between $590,93 to $741,67, and the current price is -0,09% away from the 52-week high.

IVV Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$734,96
Market Cap$821,40B
Volume2,78M
P/E Ratio0,00
Dividend Yield (TTM)0,00%
Dividend Amount$1,78
Net Income (FY)$0,00
Revenue (FY)$0,00
Revenue Estimate$0,00
Shares Outstanding1,11B
Beta (1Y)1
Ex-Dividend Date2026-03-17
Dividend Payment Date2026-03-20

About IVV

The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of large-capitalization U.S. equities.
SectorFinancial Services
IndustryAsset Management
HeadquartersNew York,NY,US

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) FAQ

What's the stock price of iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) today?

x
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is currently trading at $740,97, with a 24h change of +0,82%. The 52-week trading range is $590,93–$741,67.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV)?

x

Should you buy or sell iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV)?

x

How to buy iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) Latest News

2026-04-21 04:56Gate TradFi股票专区上线IWM、VOO、IVV、XPENG四个交易对,支持4倍固定杠杆Gate News 消息,[Gate TradFi](https://www.gate.com/zh/tradfi) 股票专区已上线 IWM(罗素 2000 ETF)、VOO(标普 500 ETF-Vanguard)、IVV(标普 500 ETF-iShares)、XPENG(小鹏集团-W 09868.HK)4 个股票 CFD 交易对,均支持 4 倍固定杠杆,最小下单数量为 0.1。 该专区涵盖传统金融资产的差价合约衍生品交易,用户可在 Gate 平台 [TradFi](https://www.gate.com/zh/tradfi) 板块进行交易。2025-07-03 00:37BTC(Bitcoin)24小时上涨3.01%Gate News Bot 消息,07月03日,据CoinMarketCap行情,截至发稿时,BTC(Bitcoin)现报 10.88万美元,24 小时内上涨3.01%,最高触及 10.98万美元,最低回落至 10.52万美元,24小时交易量达 557.46亿美元。当前市值约为 2.16万亿美元,较昨日增长 633.5亿美元。 Bitcoin是一种创新的支付网络和一种新型货币。Bitcoin使用点对点技术在没有中央机构或银行的情况下运作;交易管理和比特币的发行由网络集体完成。Bitcoin是开源的;它的设计是公开的,没有人拥有或控制Bitcoin,每个人都可以参与。通过其许多独特的属性,Bitcoin允许令人兴奋的用例,这是任何以前的支付系统所无法涵盖的。 BTC近期重要消息: 1️⃣ **比特币市值超越谷歌母公司,重返全球资产第六** 比特币市值已触及2.179万亿美元,超越谷歌母公司Alphabet的2.164万亿美元,重返全球资产市值排名第六位。这一突破凸显了比特币作为主流资产类别的地位日益巩固,投资者对其长期价值的认可度持续提升。 2️⃣ **机构投资者加速布局,贝莱德比特币ETF年费收入超标普500指数ETF** 贝莱德旗下iShares比特币ETF"IBIT"的年度管理费收入已超越其旗舰产品标普500指数ETF"IVV",达到1.86亿美元。尽管IBIT成立仅18个月,资产规模远小于IVV,但其收入表现突出,反映出机构投资者对比特币投资工具的强烈需求。 3️⃣ **全球M2货币供应量突破100万亿美元,或推动比特币价格上涨** 全球M2货币供应量创下超过100万亿美元的新纪录。历史经验表明,M2供应量的增长通常能推动比特币价格上涨。投资者可能因担忧通胀风险而转向比特币作为对冲工具,避免持有可能贬值的法定货币。 技术面上,比特币价格已突破200日简单移动平均线,暗示多头可能继续掌控局面。相对强弱指数(RSI)正在上升且已突破50中线,进一步增加了比特币继续上涨的可能性。目前市场普遍预期比特币有望挑战新的历史高点,部分分析师给出了11.9万美元的短期目标价位。 此消息不作为投资建议,投资需注意市场波动风险。2025-07-02 17:17贝莱德比特币ETF年费收入超越其S&P 500 ETF旗舰产品Gate News bot消息,据彭博社报道,贝莱德iShares Bitcoin Trust(IBIT)的年费收入已超越其旗舰产品S&P 500 ETF(IVV),尽管IBIT的资产管理规模仅为IVV的九分之一。 数据显示,截至7月1日,IBIT管理资产达到750亿美元,年费收入达1.872亿美元,超过IVV的1.871亿美元。自2024年1月比特币现货ETF获批以来,IBIT获得520亿美元净流入资金,占同类产品总流入的96%,目前持有超过55%的市场份额。 随着监管机构批准及机构资金注入,IBIT目前已跻身全美交易量前20大ETF行列。

Hot Posts su iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV)

LinkFocus

LinkFocus

05-07 10:32
2024年美国证券交易委员会(SEC)批准比特币现货ETF,被视为加密货币历史上的分水岭。不到两年时间,这一决策不仅彻底改变了市场格局,更为华尔街的金融巨头们带来了惊人的回报。如今,随着ETF的巨大成功得到验证,一场更为庞大的资本迁徙似乎正在酝酿之中。以摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)为首的顶级投行,正悄然为其管理的数万亿美元资产开启一扇通往加密世界的大门。 印钞机的诞生 要理解华尔街态度的转变,首先必须看到比特币现货ETF所创造的财富效应。其中,资产管理巨头贝莱德(BlackRock)推出的iShares比特币信托(IBIT)无疑是全场最耀眼的明星。 数据显示,IBIT自2024年1月推出以来,其资产管理规模(AUM)已逼近1000亿美元大关。更令人咋舌的是,它凭借每年超过2.44亿美元的管理费收入,已成为贝莱德旗下最赚钱的ETF产品。这一成就,甚至超越了那些运营长达25年、管理资产规模数倍于己的传统明星基金,例如追踪标普500指数的IVV。 IBIT的成功不仅体现在盈利能力上。它吸引资金的速度也创下了历史纪录。例如,在2025年10月的第一周,所有比特币现货ETF单周净流入高达32亿美元,其中IBIT独占17.8亿美元。10月6日单日,ETF市场更迎来了11.9亿美元的净流入,这是自7月以来的首个“十亿美元日”。这种惊人的吸金能力,直接将比特币价格推向了12.5万美元以上的历史新高,也向整个金融界证明:市场对合规、便捷的比特币投资渠道,存在着真实且巨大的需求。 华尔街的共识 贝莱德的成功像一颗投入平静湖面的巨石,激起了整个华尔街的涟漪。投资银行巨头摩根士丹利迅速做出反应,其全球投资委员会(GIC)发布了一份具有里程碑意义的报告,正式建议将加密货币纳入客户的资产配置版图。 这份指引极具分量,因为GIC为旗下约16000名理财顾问提供策略指导,这些顾问管理着总计高达2万亿美元的客户资产。报告的核心建议如下: 积极型投资组合(Opportunistic Growth):建议配置最高4%的加密货币。平衡成长型投资组合(Balanced Growth):建议配置最高2%。保守型及收益导向型投资组合:则建议维持0%配置。 报告中,摩根士丹利将比特币形容为“稀缺资产,类似于数字黄金”,承认其在多元化投资组合中的长期价值。这标志着比特币在顶级投行眼中,已从纯粹的“投机品”转变为可供配置的“价值资产”。 Bitwise执行长Hunter Horsley将此举形容为“巨大的突破”,他表示:“我们正在迈入主流时代。”若以摩根士丹利管理的2万亿美元资产估算,即便只有一小部分客户采纳2%至4%的建议,也意味着可能有高达400亿至800亿美元的增量资金涌入加密市场。 摩根士丹利的立场并非孤例,华尔街似乎正在形成一种“加密共识”: 贝莱德(BlackRock):先前表示,1%至2%的比特币配置是“合理的”。富达(Fidelity):研究指出,2%至5%的配置能在牛市中显著提升整体回报。灰度(Grayscale):其模型分析显示,最佳配置比例约为5%。 就连长期对加密货币持反对态度的先锋集团(Vanguard),近期也传出正在重新评估其禁止客户交易比特币ETF的政策。华尔街的风向,显然已经变了。 为何是现在? 华尔街的集体转向并非偶然,其背后是深刻的宏观经济动因和市场逻辑。 首先是全球范围内日益盛行的“贬值交易”(Debasement Trade)。随着美国政府持续的财政刺激与联准会的降息预期,市场对美元的长期信用产生疑虑,“去美元化”的趋势正在发酵。Citadel证券的肯恩·格里芬(Ken Griffin)警告,投资者正掀起规避美国主权风险的浪潮。在这种背景下,黄金价格突破4000美元/盎司,全球央行持有的黄金价值首次超过美国公债。 比特币,因其固定的供应量和去中心化的特性,被视为“数字黄金”,成为这场对抗货币贬值的交易中的另一位主角。资金从美元资产中流出,寻求黄金、比特币这类稀缺资产作为避风港,已成为一种显著趋势。 其次,传奇投资人的公开背书也起到了推波助澜的作用。对冲基金巨擘保罗·都铎·琼斯(Paul Tudor Jones)近期重申,在一个“财政不断扩张的世界”里,比特币的固定供应使其比黄金更具优势。他透露自己的投资组合中仍保有“个位数”百分比的加密货币曝险,并认为当前市场类似1999年网络泡沫破裂前的爆发式增长阶段,股市和风险资产仍有巨大上涨空间。 尽管黄金大多头彼得·希夫(Peter Schiff)对此提出异议,认为黄金的强势预示着衰退而非繁荣,但琼斯的观点无疑为机构投资者提供了强大的信心支持。 从边缘到核心 从贝莱德IBIT的巨大成功,到摩根士丹利正式将2%–4%的加密货币配置写入投资指南,再到背后深刻的宏观避险逻辑,一个清晰的图景正在浮现:加密货币,特别是比特币,正从过去被视为高风险的边缘资产,转变为现代投资组合中一个不容忽视的战略组成部分。 华尔街的行动传递了一个明确的信号:对于能够承受波动性的投资者而言,问题已不再是“是否应该配置加密货币”,而是“应该如何配置”。随着数万亿美元的传统资金开始认真审视这一新兴资产类别,加密市场的下一轮结构性变革,或许才刚刚拉开序幕。
0
0
0
0
CascadingDipBuyer

CascadingDipBuyer

04-30 19:13
Just looked into the ongoing debate between MGK and IVV, and honestly, the differences are pretty stark once you dig into the details. So here's the thing — if you're trying to decide between Vanguard's mega-cap growth play and iShares' S&P 500 tracker, the first question is really about your risk tolerance and what you're looking for. MGK is basically betting heavy on the tech giants. We're talking 69% of the fund in technology, with Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft making up a massive chunk of the portfolio. That concentration can pay off big during growth cycles, but it also means you're exposed to some serious volatility when tech stumbles. IVV, on the other hand, spreads things out across the entire S&P 500. You get exposure to all sectors — tech is still significant at 34%, but you've also got financial services, healthcare, consumer goods, and everything else. That diversification is a real cushion when one sector gets hit. Looking at the numbers, IVV has a lower expense ratio at 0.03% compared to MGK's 0.05%, which might seem tiny but compounds over time. The dividend yield difference is more noticeable though — IVV pulls in 1.2% versus MGK's 0.4%. If you care about income alongside growth, that's worth paying attention to. Performance-wise, both have done well recently, but MGK's concentration strategy comes with a price. Over the past five years, MGK experienced a max drawdown of about 36%, while IVV's was closer to 24%. That's a meaningful difference when markets get rough. MGK also has a beta of 1.17 versus IVV's 1.00, meaning it swings harder than the broader market. The liquidity angle matters too. IVV has nearly $750 billion in assets under management compared to MGK's $31.8 billion. That means if you're making large trades, IVV is going to be way easier to move in and out of without moving the price. So what's the takeaway? If you're comfortable with concentrated tech exposure and you're chasing maximum growth, MGK might appeal to you. But if you want something more stable that you can just hold long-term without sweating every tech sector dip, IVV is the cleaner choice. It's basically the difference between riding the wave and just swimming in the ocean — both work, but the risk profile is completely different.
0
0
0
0
tx_pending_forever

tx_pending_forever

04-30 14:20
So I've been thinking about how to actually build a solid Roth IRA portfolio, and honestly, it's way simpler than most people make it out to be. The thing about best index funds for roth ira is that you don't need to overthink it - what matters is picking funds that align with how long you can actually wait before touching the money. Here's what got me thinking about this: Peter Thiel threw $2,000 of PayPal founder shares into his Roth back in the late 90s. That $2,000 turned into $5 billion. The crazy part? When he hits 59.5, he pulls it all out tax-free. That's the whole point of a Roth - you take the risk now, get rewarded later, and Uncle Sam doesn't get a cut of your gains. I think the best approach is to get a bit aggressive with your Roth since you've got time on your side. But aggressive doesn't mean reckless. Let me break down what I'm actually looking at: First, there's the all-cap approach with something like Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). These guys look for companies that can double in value over five or six years. Ron Baron and his son have been doing this for over 70 years combined. The fund's heavy on Tesla though - like 46% of the portfolio - so if you're not comfortable with that concentration, it's not your play. But over ten years, this fund crushed it with 24.52% annualized returns versus 13.52% for the broader market. Then you've got the S&P 500 approach. Warren Buffett literally tells regular people to just buy a low-cost S&P 500 fund and move on. iShares Core S&P 500 (IVV) is the kind of fund that Bank of America is holding $20+ billion of. The expense ratio is basically nothing - $3 per $10,000 invested. Apple and Microsoft are your top two holdings. It's boring in the best way possible. If you want best index funds for roth ira that actually diversify beyond just US stocks, the Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is worth considering. It holds over 7,800 stocks across developed and emerging markets outside America. Europe makes up about 39% of it, Japan is the biggest single country at 15%. The expense ratio is 0.07% - basically free. The only thing is, international returns have been modest lately at 3.57% annualized. For mid-cap exposure, Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) sits in that sweet spot between growth and stability. It's been around since 1994 and has $7+ billion in assets. The managers turn the portfolio about once every 5.75 years, which keeps costs down. Since inception, it's done 11.44% annually. You get that growth potential of smaller companies with the balance sheet strength of established players. Small-cap is where things get interesting. Boston Trust Walden Small Cap Fund (BOSOX) - and yeah, the ticker is perfect if you're from Boston - has been beating the Russell 2000 by nearly 200 basis points since 1994. It's more diversified than most small-cap funds, with only about 21.6% in the top 10 holdings. The thing about building best index funds for roth ira is really about matching your risk tolerance to your timeline. You've got decades before you touch this money, so the volatility that would scare you in a taxable account shouldn't matter here. The gains are tax-free either way. I'm personally looking at a mix - some core index fund exposure, some mid-cap growth, maybe a small-cap position for that extra upside potential. The key is picking something and actually sticking with it instead of constantly trading. That's where most people mess up with retirement accounts anyway.
0
0
0
0