👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Blockchain Association: After SEC Chair Gary Gensler Sued Ripple (XRP), Binance, and Coinbase, Chair Has to Step Back
The entire digital asset industry feels under intentional attack from the Chairman of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Gary Gensler. Therefore, crypto lawyers and other industry advocates have been mounting pressure on him to recuse himself as an arbiter and judge over digital asset enforcement actions.
Specifically, Jake Chervinsky, a lawyer and Chief Policy Officer at the Blockchain Association clearly stated in an open letter that Gensler has “wrongly prejudged that all digital assets are securities.”
Based on this stance, he noted that Federal law requires that Gensler recuse himself from all enforcement decisions related to digital assets. Also, the lawyer clarified that all enforcement actions meted out by the SEC must be done following the “Wells Process.”
Barr & Young Attorneys described a Well Process as a prelude to a potential lawsuit. SEC commissioners are expected to act as neutral arbiters during this process. Their main responsibility is to weigh the evidence and arguments presented by SEC staff and the target of the enforcement without bias. Based on Chervinsky’s judgement, Gensler is nothing close to being a neutral arbiter when it concerns digital assets.
Instead, all he has done since his appointment as the SEC Chair has been to categorize all cryptocurrencies except Bitcoin (BTC) as securities. While Gensler has constantly maintained his stance on the classification of crypto as securities, Congress has not issued any official statement or regulation confirming this argument. This suggests that the entire securities talk might just be a ploy by the SEC Chair against the nascent industry.
Gensler has repeatedly pointed out that the series of enforcement actions levied on crypto entities were meant to protect investors. However, crypto investors argue that he is protecting someone but that person is not the investors who have recorded a series of losses resulting from SEC lawsuits.
Gensler May Be Working For The interest of TradFi
Some observers are saying that Gensler is intentionally cracking down on crypto firms to pave the way for traditional financial (TradFi) institutions like JPMorgan and BlackRock.
Leading digital assets service providers Binance and Coinbase were recently issued two separate lawsuits by the regulator for listing unregistered securities amongst other charges.
Tokens like BNB (BNB), Binance USD stablecoin (BUSD), Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), Polygon (MATIC), Filecoin (FIL), Cosmos Hub (ATOM), The Sandbox (SAND), Decentraland (MANA), Algorand (ALGO), Axie Infinity (AXS,) and Coti (COTI) were regarded as securities. The enforcement action caused the price of many of these coins to lose value and in turn, caused investors to forfeit several millions.
It was barely a week after these filings that investment asset management firm BlackRock filed for a spot BTC Exchange Traded Fund (ETF). More asset managers like Invesco, WisdomTree, Valkyrie and Bitwise also applied for the same offering. No approval has been issued by the SEC to any of these firms to list a spot BTC ETF, however, it seems like institutional investors have suddenly become interested in the crypto space.