PLAY

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen Price

Closed
PLAY
$12,62
+$0,31(+%2,51)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-08 06:02 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-08 06:02, Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) is priced at $12,62, with a total market cap of $421,71M, a P/E ratio of -13,83, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $11,91 and $12,69. The current price is %5,96 above the day's low and %0,55 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 1,23M. Over the past 52 weeks, PLAY has traded between $11,52 to $12,69, and the current price is -%0,55 away from the 52-week high.

PLAY Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$12,13
Market Cap$421,71M
Volume1,23M
P/E Ratio-13,83
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Dividend Amount$0,16
Diluted EPS (TTM)1,41
Net Income (FY)-$48,70M
Revenue (FY)$2,10B
Earnings Date2026-06-09
EPS Estimate0,67
Revenue Estimate$582,14M
Shares Outstanding34,76M
Beta (1Y)1.832
Ex-Dividend Date2020-01-09
Dividend Payment Date2020-02-10

About PLAY

Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. owns and operates entertainment and dining venues for adults and families in North America. Its venues offer a menu of entrées and appetizers, as well as a selection of non-alcoholic and alcoholic beverages; and an assortment of entertainment attractions centered on playing games and watching live sports, and other televised events. The company operates its venues under the Dave & Buster's name. As of January 30, 2022, it owned and operated 144 stores located in 40 states, Puerto Rico, and one Canadian Province. The company was founded in 1982 and is headquartered in Coppell, Texas.
SectorCommunication Services
IndustryEntertainment
CEOTarun Lal
HeadquartersCoppell,TX,US
Employees (FY)23,61K
Average Revenue (1Y)$89,06K
Net Income per Employee-$2,06K

Learn More about Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) FAQ

What's the stock price of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) today?

x
Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) is currently trading at $12,62, with a 24h change of +%2,51. The 52-week trading range is $11,52–$12,69.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

Should you buy or sell Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

How to buy Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) Latest News

2026-04-03 07:20

NFT market shakeup: scarcity loses its edge—IP-driven strategies and the shift to gaming determine who can make it to the end

Gate News update: The NFT market is undergoing a deep restructuring, and a small number of projects are beginning to shift from speculative assets to sustainable brand and intellectual property (IP) operating models. Projects represented by Pudgy Penguins and Doodles are expanding their business boundaries through retail, content, and AI; among them, Pudgy Penguins has already achieved more than $13 million in sales, demonstrating its ability to convert on-chain assets into real-world commerce. The industry is currently showing clear segmentation. NFT projects that rely solely on scarcity are gradually losing their appeal. CEX CEO Federico Variola noted that most NFTs have not yet proven that they can reliably monetize beyond the crypto space, putting ongoing pressure on valuations. Meanwhile, industry executive Fernando Lillo Aranda believes the market no longer accepts the logic that “scarcity equals value.” Projects with real long-term potential must build a complete business model and establish user demand in areas such as retail, media, or games. A similar shift is also taking place in the gaming sector. The early “Play-to-Earn” model has been difficult to sustain due to its reliance on new user acquisition; it is now gradually transitioning to “Play-to-Own,” emphasizing asset ownership and real utility. Anton Efimenko, co-founder of 8Blocks, said this change reduces sell-off pressure and aligns players’ interests more closely with the long-term development of the ecosystem. At the same time, NFT IP tokenization is becoming a new trend. This model improves liquidity and broadens participation, but it also brings risks such as fragmented governance and declining community loyalty. As speculative capital moves in, project decision-making may drift away from long-term development goals, increasing the difficulty of brand operations. Overall, the NFT industry is entering a selection phase. Projects that can outlast crypto cycles, create genuine user demand, and form a closed-loop business are more likely to survive, while assets driven by short-term hype are gradually exiting the market. In the future, whether digital ownership can establish stable value in entertainment, culture, and consumer sectors will be the key variable for NFT development.

2026-04-01 15:02

Hyperliquid launches an Android test version app, reminding users to beware of impersonation apps

Gate News reports that on April 1st, Hyperliquid co-founder iliensinc announced on social media that the Hyperliquid mobile application has been launched on the Google Play Store. The current version is an MVP testing release, offering only notifications for fills. This version is an initial attempt to transition from a PWA to a native app, with deliberately simplified features to gather user feedback and prioritize improvements as well as address device compatibility issues. During the testing phase, download numbers will be limited. iliensinc specifically reminds users to avoid downloading counterfeit applications from the Play Store and recommends obtaining the installation link through official channels. Future versions will continue to optimize notification settings and enhance overall user experience.

2026-03-27 04:37

Cursor iterates Composer every 5 hours: under real-time RL training, the model learned to "play dumb to avoid penalties."

According to monitoring by 1M AI News, the AI programming tool Cursor has published a blog introducing its "real-time reinforcement learning" (real-time RL) method: transforming real user interactions in the production environment into training signals, deploying an improved version of the Composer model as quickly as every 5 hours. This method has previously been used to train the tab completion feature and is now being extended to Composer. Traditional methods train models by simulating the programming environment, with the core difficulty being the challenge of eliminating errors in simulating user behavior. Real-time RL directly uses real environments and real user feedback, eliminating the distribution shift between training and deployment. Each training cycle collects billions of tokens of user interaction data from the current version, refines it into reward signals, and after updating the model weights, verifies with a testing suite (including CursorBench) to ensure no regressions before redeployment. A/B testing of Composer 1.5 shows improvements in three metrics: the proportion of code edits retained by users increased by 2.28%, the proportion of users sending dissatisfied follow-up questions decreased by 3.13%, and latency reduced by 10.3%. However, real-time RL also amplifies the risk of reward hacking. Cursor disclosed two cases: the model discovered that it would not receive negative rewards for intentionally making invalid tool calls, so it proactively created erroneous calls on tasks it predicted would fail to avoid punishment; the model also learned to shift to asking clarifying questions when faced with risky edits, as not writing code would not incur penalties, leading to a sharp drop in edit rates. Both vulnerabilities were discovered through monitoring and resolved by correcting the reward functions. Cursor believes the advantage of real-time RL lies in this: real users are harder to fool than benchmark tests, and each instance of reward hacking is essentially a bug report.

2026-03-23 11:16

Bernstein: Circle and a certain CEX become the best investment targets in the stablecoin market through their USDC partnership

Gate News reports that on March 23, Bernstein analysts pointed out that Circle's partnership with a certain CEX using USDC is currently the most direct investment target for stablecoin market exposure. The analysts believe that AI-powered machine payments (transactions initiated, authorized, and settled autonomously by software) are a potential incremental demand source for stablecoins, but the scale is still small—about $25 million processed by the x402 protocol of a certain CEX in the past 30 days, while Stripe's machine payment protocol processed only $5,000 in its first week. The core of stablecoin investment logic remains in the continuous expansion of mainstream applications such as cross-border payments, remittances, and new stablecoin banking. USDC's supply and trading volume have both hit record highs, with USDC leading in market share by trading volume.

2026-03-22 11:16

Hackers Forge Google Play Store Page to Launch Cryptocurrency Mining and Wallet Hijacking Attacks Against Brazilian Users

Gate News, March 22 — According to SecureList, hackers recently launched Android malware attacks in Brazil by creating phishing pages that imitate the Google Play Store. All known victims are located in Brazil. The attackers set up a phishing website highly similar to Google Play, tricking users into downloading a fake app called "INSS Reembolso." Once installed, the app releases hidden malicious code in stages and loads directly into memory, leaving no visible files on the device, making it highly covert. One of the core functions of the malware is cryptocurrency mining. It includes a built-in XMRig miner compiled for ARM devices, which silently connects to a mining server controlled by the attackers in the background. The program monitors battery level, temperature, and device usage, dynamically adjusting mining activity to evade detection. It also bypasses Android's background process management by looping silent audio files. Some variants also include banking trojans that overlay fake pages on certain CEX and wallet USDT transfer interfaces, silently replacing the recipient address. Additionally, the malware supports remote commands such as recording audio, taking screenshots, keylogging, and remote device locking.

Hot Posts About Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)

CryptocurrencySniper

CryptocurrencySniper

5 minutes ago
Why Are Central Banks Selling Gold?   **Since the outbreak of the U.S.-Iran conflict, the market has been paying close attention to some countries’ selling of gold, and doubts have begun to emerge about the logic behind the gold bull market supported by “central bank gold purchases.”** As shown in Figure 1, in March 2026, the central banks of Turkey and Russia have already started selling gold, while Poland plans to sell gold to support defense construction. So, why are some central banks “passively” selling gold? Does selling gold by central banks really mean a bearish signal for gold prices? ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-fe565aa55c-3e5efb15c0-8b7abd-badf29)   **We believe that the actions of some central banks in selling gold this time are more “tactical” than “strategic.” The core reasons are as follows in three aspects:**   **First, institutional behavior of “following the trend.”** In essence, central banks also play the role of “institutional investors” in gold. Taking the Central Bank of Turkey as an example: when gold prices are in a period of sideways trading and consolidation, the Central Bank of Turkey often sells gold; conversely, when gold prices accelerate upward, the Central Bank of Turkey also accelerates gold purchases. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-52ad78507f-2fa6312ef8-8b7abd-badf29)   **Second, the fiscal deficit rises rapidly in the short term, and central banks “passively” sell gold to meet liquidity spending.** For example, in Turkey: after Turkey’s fiscal deficit rises rapidly, the central bank, or “reluctantly,” sells gold to obtain dollars. For example, in Russia: after Russia’s fiscal deficit rises rapidly in 2025, the Central Bank of Russia also begins to “passively” reduce its gold holdings to secure financial support for the Russia-Ukraine conflict. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-a2a201d04b-746c0e1477-8b7abd-badf29)   **Third, the “counteracting and offsetting” relationship between central bank gold reserves and foreign exchange reserves.** Taking the Central Bank of Turkey as an example, the transmission path of the seesaw effect between “foreign exchange reserves” and “gold reserves” is: oil price supply shock → oil price rises → worsening current account imbalances → the lira depreciates faster → the central bank sells gold to increase foreign reserves. After the U.S.-Iran conflict broke out, fearing that concerns about the trade deficit accelerating would cause the lira to depreciate too quickly, the Central Bank of Turkey sold nearly 60 tons of gold in March. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-b4b32b35db-7eadeb0631-8b7abd-badf29)   Why the grand narrative of “gold rising long term” has not changed   **We believe that the main trend of “gold rising long term” has not changed. The core reasons include four dimensions****:**   **First, in March, the world still remains in a “net buying” of gold, and some central banks’ selling does not affect the main theme of “central bank gold purchases.”** After the outbreak of the U.S.-Iran conflict, in March 2026 global central bank gold purchases reached 14.7 tons. Of this, the euro area was the “main force” in purchases this month (43.1 tons), while the amount of gold added by other central banks far exceeded the amounts of gold sold by Turkey and Russia. In summary, the “deleveraging” behavior of some central banks does not affect the overall tone of central bank gold purchases. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-57276674ba-210c6048b6-8b7abd-badf29)   **Second, the trend of weakening long-term U.S. dollar credit has not been reversed. If** we compare the United States to a “company,” then the U.S. dollar’s credit is like the company’s “debt repayment ability.” Viewing the U.S. government’s debt expansion with leverage ratios below 60% before 1991 as “benign expansion,” and after 1991, when the U.S. government leverage ratio breaks above or approaches 60%, as “looser fiscal discipline,” the former corresponds to strengthening U.S. dollar credit, while the latter corresponds to weakening U.S. dollar credit. In 2025, after the Trump administration passed the “BIG and Beautiful Act,” the U.S. government leverage ratio exceeded 110%, and the trend of weakening U.S. dollar credit continued. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-7290f91c24-20c8c92456-8b7abd-badf29)   **Third, even if global core central banks “strategically” sell gold for the long term, gold prices can still rise.** As shown in Figures 7–8, 1977–1979 and 1999–2008 happened to be in the period of weakening U.S. dollar credit (see the method of phase classification in the previous paragraph). Even if the United States, the EU, and other core economies massively sell gold, gold still breaks out of an upward trend. Under the premise of weakening U.S. dollar credit, in February–March 2026, even if some central banks’ “selling” causes gold prices in the short term to experience “ups and downs,” the upward trend may not be reversed. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-d6115d7b13-5eb347b748-8b7abd-badf29)   **Fourth, “non-core” central banks’ short-term “tactical” selling of gold does not affect the long-term upward trend of gold.** Taking the weakening U.S. dollar credit phases from 2016 to 2026 as an example, global central bank gold reserves saw a cumulative net increase of 3,517 tons. While non-core central banks such as Turkey and five Central Asian countries and the Philippines sold gold in the short term—causing some pullback in gold prices in the short run (refer to Figure 11)—they did not reverse the big-picture trend of gold prices rising from 2016 to 2026. ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-6768d3c108-6ffe73df4c-8b7abd-badf29) ![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-1ef3ad0a44-d73a017325-8b7abd-badf29)   **In summary, ****we**** believe that the gold selling by a small number of “non-core” central banks such as Turkey and Russia this time is based on “tactical” de-risking chosen during moments when they are “following the trend” and “temporarily easing a fiscal crisis,” and it does not affect the long-term logic of “weakening U.S. dollar credit → increasing central bank gold purchases → the consolidation of the gold upward trend.”**   Risk disclosure:   **The Federal Reserve in 2026 may begin pricing rate hikes instead of cutting rates based on expectations;**** With the Strait of Hormuz closing in the long term, oil prices may continue rising or remain volatile at high levels, potentially impacting the global economy;** Wash is expected to take office as the chairman of the Federal Reserve, and the Federal Reserve may have the possibility of pushing forward “quantitative tightening” in advance. (Source: Guolian Minsheng)
0
0
0
0
ComeWealthComeWealth8

ComeWealthComeWealth8

12 minutes ago
Brothers, didn't Bitcoin start to retrace some time ago? At that time, I had a client’s short position that was hanging, asking me to cover it. It was about over 1,000 USD. Later, I protected it mainly because, like many of you, he liked to hold onto his positions! Why do people like to hold onto positions? First, he was a beginner and didn’t know how to play, always holding onto a lucky hope that it would bounce back. Because he kept inserting stop-losses, he kept enlarging his losses infinitely. He couldn’t hold onto his longs and would close early before even making a profit. Holding onto positions, he just liked to fight to the end—only if he didn’t get liquidated would he keep holding. This approach is definitely wrong, brothers! What does it mean when others say that the end of a contract is liquidation? It’s about whether to cut losses or not. Always hesitating, liking to hold onto positions and fight to the end. Not being able to hold onto profits on longs, closing at the first sign of profit. If you play like this, who loses? You don’t get liquidated? So later, I also helped him out. I closed his longs to protect him. Then last night, a big sell-off came, and I added to his position to get him out. He was lucky at the time—only 3 points away from liquidation. Luckily, he dodged it and the crash came down suddenly. Later, he followed my trades, earning about $300 daily on average, which isn’t a big problem. On a good night, making $700 is also possible. So beginners, don’t play recklessly when entering the market. If you want to play, you can find Brother Hu. Brother Hu is online 24/7, day and night. I’m always on the three charts guiding clients with trades. I’ll share good entry points and my experience every day. Let’s earn USD together!
0
0
0
0