福利加码,Gate 廣場明星帶單交易員三期招募開啟!
入駐發帖 · 瓜分 $30,000 月度獎池 & 千萬級流量扶持!
如何參與:
1️⃣ 報名成為跟單交易員:https://www.gate.com/copytrading/lead-trader-registration/futures
2️⃣ 報名活動:https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7355
3️⃣ 入駐 Gate 廣場,持續發布交易相關原創內容
豐厚獎勵等你拿:
首發優質內容即得 $30 跟單體驗金
每雙周瓜分 $10,000U 內容獎池
Top 10 交易員額外瓜分 $20,000U 登榜獎池
精選帖推流、首頁推薦、周度明星交易員曝光
詳情:https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/50291
This morning's @RialoHQ Shark Tank was honestly nothing like what I expected from a pitch event. It felt more like several project teams getting together to sync on progress and checkpoints.
The overall vibe was pretty relaxed. The host even chatted about food during the opening, the pace was slow and easy, no signs of overly rehearsed performances, and nobody came out with grand narratives. Everyone was pretty straightforward—talking about what's done, what's stuck, laying it all out openly. That's what made it feel genuinely authentic.
There were just three projects total, which was just right—you could actually absorb it all. Let me share my quick thoughts:
**First project: automated trading.** The logic is actually quite clear—taking traditional off-chain trading bot mechanics and executing them directly on-chain. No need for third parties watching the charts; rules are hardcoded on-chain, removing middlemen. The structure is clean. But it's never run with real money yet, still just at the "logic is viable" stage. There's still distance to go before handling real market volatility.
**Second: real estate RWA.** This feels more like testing reality's boundaries. On-chain is just a small part; the real headaches are all off-chain. They chose Nigeria to start, even set up an offline property inspection team. That shows they're not just playing NFT gimmicks—they understand the need for real-world compliance and execution. But this kind of project is destined to be slow. Every new market means rerunning through regulations. Fast scaling isn't realistic.
**Third: AI agent.** This looks more like an experimental ground to me. Not treating AI as a tool, but letting it become an independent agent that can take tasks, earn bounties, and participate in markets. Using cost mechanisms instead of human review—the logic flows on-chain, but the core question remains the same: is there real demand and real users? No tasks, no users, and even a perfect mechanism just spins empty.
Looking at all three together, the direction is actually consistent: they're all shifting execution rights away from people and centralized platforms, moving them onto the chain.
The direction is sound, but reality is this kind of migration can't happen all at once, especially when dealing with real assets and complex AI behaviors. Whether on-chain rules can actually handle it still needs genuine validation.
People at the event asked about security, compliance, and profit models. Honestly, I don't think that matters much at this stage. Whether there are bugs gets found through running it. Whether it's compliant becomes clear after launch. Whether it can make money only matters if people actually use it.
My expectations for Rialo Shark Tank are simple: no performance-style pitching. Keep it real, talk substance. Less grand narrative, more progress updates, sticking points, and actual test results. Getting projects to actually ship beats everything else. If there are questions, don't hold back—go straight for the core issues.