Just noticed something pretty interesting about how Lido DAO is tackling the governance token valuation problem. They're proposing to spend up to 10,000 stETH (roughly $20 million at current prices) to buy back their own LDO token, which has absolutely cratered—we're talking a 95% drop from its 2021 peak of $7.30.



Here's where it gets tricky. On-chain liquidity for LDO is basically non-existent. We're talking only $90,000 of depth at plus-or-minus 2%, which means any serious buy pressure would immediately move the market. So the DAO has to route this through major crypto exchanges and market makers to actually execute the buyback without destroying the price.

What's fascinating here is the fundamental mismatch the proposal highlights. LDO is down over 95% from peak, currently trading around $0.33 with a market cap of roughly $280 million. But look at Lido's actual fundamentals—the protocol still controls about 23% of all staked ETH, fees are solid, and the take rate actually improved to 6.11%. The LDO-to-ETH ratio is at a 70% discount compared to where it sat for most of the past two years. This is exactly the kind of dislocation you'd expect to see in a crypto market that's completely disconnected from protocol performance.

The execution plan is methodical. They'd process this in 1,000 stETH batches through Easy Track governance, with a three-day objection period for each batch. This keeps things from signaling the exact timing to the market, which is smart given how thin liquidity is.

But here's the real question that cuts deeper. Why is a dominant DAO with strong fundamentals trading at this valuation? The broader crypto market seems to have decided that governance tokens without direct fee distribution don't deserve to trade on protocol metrics at all. It's pure speculation territory. Whether Lido's buyback actually changes that narrative depends on whether the market ever reprices what a governance token is actually worth. That's the real test.
STETH-3,7%
LDO-6,18%
ETH-3,87%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin