Mars Finance reports that according to CoinDesk, the DeFi Education Fund (DEF) based in Washington, D.C., responded to the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regarding the regulatory consultation on crypto asset activities. They stated that regulatory obligations should only apply to entities that have “unilateral control” over user assets or transactions, and should not be considered intermediaries solely for developing or participating in decentralized protocols. DEF advocates that “control” should be linked to specific operational permissions such as initiating or stopping transactions unilaterally, modifying protocol parameters, or excluding users. They also warn that directly applying the prudential regulation, reporting requirements, platform access, and comprehensive anti-money laundering obligations of centralized exchanges to automated, non-custodial DeFi protocols would be structurally incompatible.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
DeFi Education Foundation urges UK regulators to tighten the "control" definition to avoid harming developers
Mars Finance reports that according to CoinDesk, the DeFi Education Fund (DEF) based in Washington, D.C., responded to the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regarding the regulatory consultation on crypto asset activities. They stated that regulatory obligations should only apply to entities that have “unilateral control” over user assets or transactions, and should not be considered intermediaries solely for developing or participating in decentralized protocols. DEF advocates that “control” should be linked to specific operational permissions such as initiating or stopping transactions unilaterally, modifying protocol parameters, or excluding users. They also warn that directly applying the prudential regulation, reporting requirements, platform access, and comprehensive anti-money laundering obligations of centralized exchanges to automated, non-custodial DeFi protocols would be structurally incompatible.