In the face of on-chain risks, the response plan for ordinary users is actually to establish a multi-layer defense system. Asset layering is fundamental—don't put all your eggs in one basket; diversify your holdings to also diversify risk. Isolated testing of large and small accounts is a detail but an important practice. Before launching a new version or engaging in unfamiliar interactions, try it out with a small account first; this way, the cost of踩坑 can be controlled. Multi-signature wallets are even more critical—they require multiple private keys or multiple addresses to authorize a transfer, so even if one part is attacked, the funds cannot be moved. Essentially, this turns a single point of failure into a manageable local loss, reducing the hacker's profit-to-cost ratio to a level not worth the effort.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PermabullPete
· 22h ago
Multi-signature wallets have really saved me several times. Multi-layer defense is indeed the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 12-28 20:37
Multi-signature wallets are indeed secure, but very few people can actually execute them properly; most are just theoretical discussions.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlady
· 12-27 12:20
That's right, but very few people can actually do it. I myself have split into three wallets, but I still messed up on a certain interaction. Now I've learned to be smarter; using a secondary account for testing is truly a lifesaver.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterZhang
· 12-26 20:00
Multi-signature wallets are really a must-have for breaking even, but to be honest, I now go all-in with both small and large accounts together. Anyway, if I get wiped out, I get wiped out.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 12-26 19:57
That's true, but I think most people simply can't do it. Managing multiple wallet addresses alone is already enough of a hassle.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 12-26 19:55
Multi-signature wallets have really saved me several times. Looking back now, I feel a bit scared.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 12-26 19:54
I've been playing the diversified holdings strategy for a long time. To put it simply, don't put all your eggs in one basket, really.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpster
· 12-26 19:50
Multi-signature has really saved me several times, but most people are still too lazy.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForAirdrops
· 12-26 19:49
Multi-signature has really saved me several times. Looking back now, I feel a bit scared.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetScholar
· 12-26 19:45
Multi-signature wallets are truly amazing. It took some time to set up, and now my sleep quality has skyrocketed.
In the face of on-chain risks, the response plan for ordinary users is actually to establish a multi-layer defense system. Asset layering is fundamental—don't put all your eggs in one basket; diversify your holdings to also diversify risk. Isolated testing of large and small accounts is a detail but an important practice. Before launching a new version or engaging in unfamiliar interactions, try it out with a small account first; this way, the cost of踩坑 can be controlled. Multi-signature wallets are even more critical—they require multiple private keys or multiple addresses to authorize a transfer, so even if one part is attacked, the funds cannot be moved. Essentially, this turns a single point of failure into a manageable local loss, reducing the hacker's profit-to-cost ratio to a level not worth the effort.