Speed matters in shipping, sure—but here's the thing: what truly sets apart exceptional projects is refusing to compromise on quality. Fast deployment means nothing if you're shipping broken features or a subpar user experience. The teams that win long-term aren't the ones racing to launch first; they're the ones shipping features that actually work, that users trust, that don't waste people's time. In Web3, where user trust is already fragile, cutting corners on product quality isn't a shortcut—it's a shortcut to failure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TopEscapeArtist
· 22h ago
That's right, this is exactly the fundamental reflected by the technical aspect. Going live quickly is like chasing a rally at a high level—looks satisfying but ultimately leaves gaps that need to be filled. I've experienced this many times... Quality is the real support line; once it's broken, it's broken, and there's no way to catch the bottom for a rebound.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 12-27 06:13
That's right. Now, those projects that rushed to launch have basically become negative examples.
View OriginalReply0
SelfRugger
· 12-26 19:54
You can't build trust, and that's what Web3 lacks the most.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 12-26 19:53
Quickly launching something, a bunch of bugs and poor user experience are the real time-wasters.
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisser
· 12-26 19:48
I just want to ask, do project teams still genuinely care about quality now? They're all just trying to make a quick profit and then run.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDream
· 12-26 19:43
Really, what's the point of speed? Anyway, right now, a bunch of projects are just rushing to launch and then crashing. It's better to do things properly. Web3 users already don't trust easily, and if you keep releasing half-finished features, you're just asking for trouble.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleShadow
· 12-26 19:37
That's true, but I see too many projects rushing to launch just to be the first, only to end up with a bunch of bugs and repeatedly scamming users. In Web3, where trust is already fragile, compromising on quality is really a suicidal act.
Speed matters in shipping, sure—but here's the thing: what truly sets apart exceptional projects is refusing to compromise on quality. Fast deployment means nothing if you're shipping broken features or a subpar user experience. The teams that win long-term aren't the ones racing to launch first; they're the ones shipping features that actually work, that users trust, that don't waste people's time. In Web3, where user trust is already fragile, cutting corners on product quality isn't a shortcut—it's a shortcut to failure.