2025-12-26 17:24:18

Don't be fooled by Bitcoin's recent flat performance; the real issue isn't the coin itself. Frankly, gold and silver are being drained—traditional funds are still pouring into these two "old antiques."

This is the key point: once this portion of funds shifts, how fierce will BTC's rebound be? Gold and silver won't even be in the same league. History has long proven that once the crypto market starts moving, the gains in traditional precious metals are simply not comparable.

Funds are limited, and where they flow determines the returns. When the market re-recognizes Bitcoin's value, this transfer will happen quickly and fiercely.

BTC-1,72%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseLandlord

· 12-29 06:13

Golden bloodsucking really, traditional funds are still dragging their feet there Once this wave of capital shifts, BTC will soar to the sky

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 12-28 22:01

The idea that gold and silver are "bloodsucking" is a bit far-fetched; the key issue still lies in the rhythm of traditional capital entering the market. But on the other hand, once the shift happens, it will indeed be very fierce. Wait, it would be too simple if it were that easy. We still have to look at the Federal Reserve folks' faces. I believe traditional precious metals can't outperform BTC, but I'm worried that capital simply won't flow into the crypto space at all.

View OriginalReply0

EthSandwichHero

· 12-26 17:54

The term "golden bloodsucking" is brilliant. Traditional funds are still clinging to old relics, waiting for them to turn back and look at BTC—that's the real show.

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer

· 12-26 17:51

The idea of gold and silver "bloodsucking" is indeed something I've heard before, but how long would it really take to shift? It seems traditional funds are still quite conservative.

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Whisperer

· 12-26 17:39

The saying that gold and silver are bloodsuckers has become tiresome. Every time, it's said that a shift in funds will lead to a surge. But what’s the result? Still waiting here. Wait, wait, wait, until the flowers wither, I just want to ask, when will the shift happen? It's true that traditional precious metals haven't seen the same gains, but don't compare them to vampires; at least they are stable. This logic has been used for so many years, how come some people still believe it? I agree that fund flow determines returns, but only if the funds really come in, not just talk. And again, "once the shift happens, it’s invincible." I’ve heard this phrase so many times I’ve developed calluses. Just come out and say you’re bearish on gold.

View OriginalReply0

BugBountyHunter