This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainArchaeologist
· 12-28 13:08
Insider? 7 million? This time it's really a big deal. Compensation is good, but who dares to continue using it with such a weak defense line?
---
It's the same old problem with permission management. Every time they say they will fix it, but it remains the same.
---
2.68 got hacked. Luckily, there was no update, but this incident definitely exposed management vulnerabilities in wallets.
---
Money loss can be solved, but the real issue is what to do when user trust is gone.
---
Internal audit should be thoroughly reviewed from the beginning. Compensation alone is just superficial.
---
Looks like I need to consider those niche wallets; even the big ones may not be safe.
---
Seven million, huh? That's a pretty big scale. No wonder the community is upset.
---
From development to updates, the entire chain needs to be checked. Don't let this happen again.
---
How many times have we said transparent management processes? When will they finally be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
0xLostKey
· 12-26 17:49
The insider issue really can't be contained anymore; 7 million USD is gone just like that. Trust Wallet's security governance needs a thorough investigation.
---
Full compensation sounds good, but the problem is, once trust is broken, can it be glued back together?
---
Only version 2.68 had issues. I'm a bit scared now. Should I update immediately?
---
From development to updates, every step is a black box. How can users feel secure? That's the most terrifying part.
---
As soon as the insider hypothesis came out, I knew this wasn't so simple. Permission management in the wallet industry really needs to be as tight as a sieve.
---
Losing money is one thing, but how to restore confidence in the ecosystem? This issue is even more painful than the 7 million USD.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 12-26 17:48
Insider? No way... Just a slip of the hand, $7 million slipped away.
---
Full compensation again? The trust level is really okay, but what about next time?
---
Version 2.68 caught in the crossfire, I just wonder why it’s specifically this version.
---
Every time they say they reflect, is wallet security really that hard to manage?
---
Oh no, here we go again. When will we truly be able to stand firm?
---
Internal permission management isn’t clear enough, no matter how many times it happens, it’s useless.
---
Compensate and it’s over? What about transparency? The promised open process?
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 12-26 17:42
Coming again? Trust Wallet messed up this time. Is it still internal sabotage or just poor technical skills? $7 million is gone just like that. It seems wallet security really needs to be rebuilt from scratch.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-40edb63b
· 12-26 17:38
$7 million lost overnight, and the internal leak theory hasn't been confirmed yet. Better to lose some money first and then figure it out. This routine feels a bit familiar.
---
Trust is really fragile. A single bug in one version can destroy everything.
---
It's another case of internal permission management failure. When will wallet manufacturers finally get their defenses solid?
---
Can losing money be whitewashed? I’d rather know how they got in and how to prevent it next time.
---
Is version 2.68 just a flop? Well, my version is still okay... but I’m starting to panic too.
---
Compliance and transparent management? Bringing this up in Web3 is like telling a joke. If it were really possible, this wouldn’t be an issue.
---
Looks like wallets aren’t an absolute safe haven either; we still need to stay vigilant ourselves.
---
As soon as the internal leak theory comes out, the community starts making jokes again. Truly never a dull moment.
Trust Wallet浏览器扩展遭入侵:700万美元损失背后的安全治理困局
【币界】又是一场钱包惊魂。知名人士暗示Trust Wallet浏览器扩展的入侵背后可能隐藏内鬼,这个猜测一出,立刻引发圈内关注。
事实是,这次安全事故造成用户损失约700万美元,数字不小。Trust Wallet随后宣布将全额赔偿受害用户,算是及时止血的举动。不过需要注意的是,只有2.68版本的浏览器扩展程序躺枪,其他版本用户暂时可以松口气。
这事儿反映出一个更深层的问题:加密钱包的内部访问权限到底怎么管理的?从开发到更新,每个环节的安全治理都值得拷问。用户把资金交给钱包,信任是基础。一旦底层防线出现漏洞,整个生态的信心就会动摇。后续怎么加强防控、透明化管理流程,这才是行业该反思的地方。