Many people have experienced this dilemma: optimistic about the long-term prospects of an asset, but suddenly needing cash. Sell it, and watch the subsequent gains be eaten up by others. Hold on, and you're stuck in a passive waiting game. Is there a way to have both?
This is exactly the problem that some emerging DeFi protocols aim to solve. They offer a third option: preserve your exposure to the asset while generating stablecoins on-chain, allowing you to access funds without selling the asset itself.
The operational logic is actually simple. You deposit approved collateral—cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, or tokenized real-world assets—into a vault. The system then allows you to mint stablecoins based on these collateral assets. This way, you retain the potential for growth of your original position while gaining flexible, usable liquidity.
For holders, the key appeal lies in flexibility. No matter how the market fluctuates, your core position remains intact. When you need cash, you can directly use the minted stablecoins instead of being forced to sell at a low price. Especially in uncertain market conditions, this mechanism can effectively alleviate the psychological pressure of passive selling.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseLandlord
· 19h ago
Sounds good, but when it comes to the moment of liquidation risk, you'll realize what a crash really means.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 22h ago
Well... this logic, to put it simply, is like locking up collateral as if it were antiques, then "extract" liquidity from it. It's a bit like medieval wool merchants—not selling sheep, just continuously exchanging wool for cash.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMaker
· 12-27 05:55
Haha, this is exactly what I've been looking for. No need to cut losses and still cash out, sounds almost too good to be true.
By the way, if this logic is used properly, it can indeed avoid many situations where you're forced to exit. I'm just worried that the risk parameters might be set incorrectly, and a wave of liquidations could leave people confused.
Even in a bad market, you can still trick stablecoins, which is a real lifesaver for small traders who urgently need liquidity.
It's basically an upgraded version of collateralization + lending. As long as you don't overleverage and play recklessly, it's quite a good approach.
Will it eventually evolve into another form of rug... depends on the integrity of the protocol team.
Are there any recommended projects? I want to avoid pitfalls.
Watching others profit from price increases really feels tough. Having this intermediate solution is quite nice.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 12-26 19:50
Whoa, isn't this just lending and borrowing? Changing the disguise and still having to pay interest, doesn't seem that attractive anymore.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 12-26 16:50
Isn't this just a new way of collateralized lending? The question is, who will bear the liquidation risk?
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperer
· 12-26 16:46
Sounds good, but basically it's just a different name for lending and borrowing. What about the risks? The liquidation price is tightly controlled.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossiper
· 12-26 16:39
Wow, isn't this just collateralized lending? Why does it have to be so complicated... But on the other hand, it really solves my pain points, and I no longer have to worry about whether to cut my losses or not.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 12-26 16:35
Isn't this just collateralized lending? It sounds good, but what about the risks? A sudden wave can trigger liquidation at any time.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHole
· 12-26 16:35
Damn, isn't this just collateralized borrowing? I've played with it before, and the risk is really not small.
View OriginalReply0
MemeKingNFT
· 12-26 16:33
It's the same old story... I tried it in Compound last year, and the liquidation threshold was set ridiculously low. One sudden drop and I was liquidated instantly, it was a heart attack. It seems like you can have both fish and bear's paw, but in reality, it's just another form of being cut off.
Many people have experienced this dilemma: optimistic about the long-term prospects of an asset, but suddenly needing cash. Sell it, and watch the subsequent gains be eaten up by others. Hold on, and you're stuck in a passive waiting game. Is there a way to have both?
This is exactly the problem that some emerging DeFi protocols aim to solve. They offer a third option: preserve your exposure to the asset while generating stablecoins on-chain, allowing you to access funds without selling the asset itself.
The operational logic is actually simple. You deposit approved collateral—cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, or tokenized real-world assets—into a vault. The system then allows you to mint stablecoins based on these collateral assets. This way, you retain the potential for growth of your original position while gaining flexible, usable liquidity.
For holders, the key appeal lies in flexibility. No matter how the market fluctuates, your core position remains intact. When you need cash, you can directly use the minted stablecoins instead of being forced to sell at a low price. Especially in uncertain market conditions, this mechanism can effectively alleviate the psychological pressure of passive selling.