#美联储联邦公开市场委员会决议 Recently, liquidity withdrawal has cooled down. How are things on your side?
I've heard that many carefully selected merchants are tightening their policies, often asking users or their family members to operate accounts. I think this approach is a bit risky—if a problem arises, responsibility is very unclear, and merchants themselves do not have direct verified payments, making subsequent tracing difficult.
One merchant claims to have locked tens of thousands in margin at a major exchange, implying that risk is manageable. But having a large margin doesn't necessarily mean the verification process is compliant.
Identity verification and fund flow issues still need to be handled responsibly. If merchants arbitrarily transfer payment parties, it’s really hard to assign responsibility in case of disputes. $BTC Major cryptocurrencies are easier to track, but with small coins and deposit/withdrawal processes, caution is still necessary.
What do you all think? Is the increased difficulty in withdrawals due to stricter risk controls or is liquidity genuinely tight?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
27 Likes
Reward
27
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HalfPositionRunner
· 12-17 07:01
Oh no, I really felt it this time. The withdrawal queue was so long.
Operate on a family member's account? That’s just asking for trouble. If something goes wrong, no one will know who’s responsible.
View OriginalReply0
TradingNightmare
· 12-17 02:13
Damn, this wave of risk control is really harsh. I waited half a day for my withdrawal to arrive yesterday...
The merchant asked the user to operate through a family member's account? That's just talking nonsense. If something goes wrong, no one can escape.
What’s the point of having more margin? If KYC isn’t solid, it’s still GG. I’ve seen too many of these disaster scenes.
Liquidity is indeed tight, not just on my end. A friend told me everything is stuck. We really need to be cautious this time...
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 12-16 02:16
This wave has definitely been felt. Several merchants have started to play the "indirect approach," using friends' accounts to get around... Basically, they're just being cowardly.
The margin system really doesn't work, it's like holding a shield to cover your face and pretending nothing's wrong. The risk control has been watching closely for a long time.
Small altcoins are indeed risky. You can still chase BTC, but once trash coins withdraw, they seem to disappear completely.
View OriginalReply0
TooScaredToSell
· 12-16 01:07
Bro, your analysis this time is spot on. I also feel it myself—withdrawals have indeed become much more difficult... Those merchants operating through family member accounts are really playing with fire.
View OriginalReply0
ILCollector
· 12-14 09:05
Wow, it's really hard to get new coins now. I've been blocked twice on my end.
Having family manage it for you is risky; if anything goes wrong, no one can escape. That's just inviting trouble.
What's the use of having a big margin if KYC doesn't pass—it's all pointless...
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeaker
· 12-14 09:05
Yes, this round of risk control is indeed strict. Several merchants around me are struggling.
Using family accounts like this really is digging a hole for oneself. When problems arise later, no one can run away.
What good is having a large margin? The key is whether it can be traced on the chain, right?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxiety
· 12-14 09:04
Oh no, the difficulty of this withdrawal is really unbearable. I've also been stuck on several transactions.
Operate using someone else's account? Isn't that just inviting trouble? If something goes wrong, no one can explain it clearly.
Having a large margin is just a cover-up; if the process isn't compliant, a crash is inevitable.
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPudding
· 12-14 09:04
The withdrawal is indeed stuck, and I have felt it on my end as well. But letting a family member's account handle such operations is really playing with fire; the risk is too high.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtist
· 12-14 09:00
Oh wow, using a family member's account is really a genius move. Who takes the blame if something goes wrong?
#美联储联邦公开市场委员会决议 Recently, liquidity withdrawal has cooled down. How are things on your side?
I've heard that many carefully selected merchants are tightening their policies, often asking users or their family members to operate accounts. I think this approach is a bit risky—if a problem arises, responsibility is very unclear, and merchants themselves do not have direct verified payments, making subsequent tracing difficult.
One merchant claims to have locked tens of thousands in margin at a major exchange, implying that risk is manageable. But having a large margin doesn't necessarily mean the verification process is compliant.
Identity verification and fund flow issues still need to be handled responsibly. If merchants arbitrarily transfer payment parties, it’s really hard to assign responsibility in case of disputes. $BTC Major cryptocurrencies are easier to track, but with small coins and deposit/withdrawal processes, caution is still necessary.
What do you all think? Is the increased difficulty in withdrawals due to stricter risk controls or is liquidity genuinely tight?