The L2 war is in full swing. Over 134 layer 2s have already been launched, but what about Ethereum, which forms the foundation? It still struggles with slow finality, exorbitant gas fees, and even faces structural limitations like the single sequencer model.



Ironically, whether there are a hundred or a thousand L2s, the core issue is that they all end up sharing the same bottleneck. The competition for scalability is fierce, yet the base layer remains unchanged? It feels like something’s not adding up. The real breakthrough might come from redesigning the base layer itself.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityLurkervip
· 12h ago
There are 134 L2s already, and people are still playing musical chairs? Honestly, they’re all getting stuck on Ethereum. No matter how many L2s there are, it can’t solve the fundamental problem. The underlying layer needs to be changed.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 12h ago
134 L2s are still a joke. Fundamentally, ETH's base is already rotten, and they're still trying to pretend with a single sequencer?
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivorvip
· 12h ago
The L2 numbers just keep increasing, but in the end, the ETH bottleneck remains a chronic problem... Isn't this honestly a ridiculous situation?
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 12h ago
134? Isn’t it just increasing the numbers... If it’s the same bottleneck anyway, what’s the point?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)