There’s been another incident in South Korea. After a major exchange was hacked, it took them more than 6 hours to report it to the regulators—this move is truly baffling.
What’s even more explosive is the possible reason behind it—rumor has it that their parent company was in the middle of acquisition talks with a domestic tech giant, and they were afraid that news of the hack would derail the deal. Regulatory filings show that the platform held an emergency meeting just 18 minutes after detecting the anomaly, 27 minutes… (subsequent response timeline is unclear).
Honestly, this kind of “withholding information for the sake of a deal” is quite dangerous. Which is more important: user asset security or regulatory compliance? The answer should be obvious. For the industry to go far, transparency and timely response are essential.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotFinancialAdviser
· 12-08 07:32
Suppressing notifications for the sake of trading? This is basically treating users as bargaining chips—ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 12-08 07:31
just like mile 20 hits different, this is where the marathon separates sprinters from real runners. suppressing breach data for an m&a deal? that's literally shooting yourself in the foot at the finish line. fundamentals matter, and security theater kills ecosystems long-term.
Reply0
StablecoinEnjoyer
· 12-08 07:31
To cover up a hack for the sake of a merger? Ridiculous, what do they take users for?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 12-08 07:30
lmao 18 mins to convene emergency meeting but 6+ hours to file? that's not a bug it's a feature... classic m&a optics management tbh. opportunity cost of disclosure vs deal closure, calculated to the basis point probably
Reply0
SignatureDenied
· 12-08 07:27
This is what I was talking about—Korean exchanges are getting greedier one after another.
It's a typical case of first hiding the truth and then shifting the blame, making users passive victims.
Reporting after 6 hours? What a joke. They were probably negotiating mergers while watching the market.
There's no way to control this kind of thing; you can only look out for yourself.
There’s been another incident in South Korea. After a major exchange was hacked, it took them more than 6 hours to report it to the regulators—this move is truly baffling.
What’s even more explosive is the possible reason behind it—rumor has it that their parent company was in the middle of acquisition talks with a domestic tech giant, and they were afraid that news of the hack would derail the deal. Regulatory filings show that the platform held an emergency meeting just 18 minutes after detecting the anomaly, 27 minutes… (subsequent response timeline is unclear).
Honestly, this kind of “withholding information for the sake of a deal” is quite dangerous. Which is more important: user asset security or regulatory compliance? The answer should be obvious. For the industry to go far, transparency and timely response are essential.