Honestly, that whole debate about vampire attacks? It's been dead in the water for ages now.
Why? Because most people flip their stance the second their bag starts pumping or dumping. You're anti-vamp when your token gets drained, then suddenly it's innovation when you're on the winning side. The hypocrisy is exhausting.
That said, my position hasn't changed—developer fees still rub me the wrong way. There's something fundamentally off about baking rent-seeking into protocol design.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlwaysMissingTops
· 20h ago
Chives are originally chives
View OriginalReply0
DefiSecurityGuard
· 20h ago
DYOR before any protocol exposure
Reply0
gaslight_gasfeez
· 20h ago
The bloodsucking should have been curbed long ago.
Honestly, that whole debate about vampire attacks? It's been dead in the water for ages now.
Why? Because most people flip their stance the second their bag starts pumping or dumping. You're anti-vamp when your token gets drained, then suddenly it's innovation when you're on the winning side. The hypocrisy is exhausting.
That said, my position hasn't changed—developer fees still rub me the wrong way. There's something fundamentally off about baking rent-seeking into protocol design.