Recently, I noticed a rather interesting perspective—what is the true bottleneck for on-chain capital?
Many people focus on AMMs and lending protocols, but in reality, the most critical issue is the underlying capital efficiency. DeFi strategies are too fragmented right now: lending is just lending, trading is just trading, and your funds have to jump between various protocols, losing value with every move.
Astros' proposed Prime architecture is actually quite straightforward—it aims to break this isolated state. Instead of having funds constantly bounce between different platforms, it's better to reconstruct the logic from the ground up.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Blockblind
· 12-07 16:10
That's right, the silo problem is indeed underestimated. Every time we interact across protocols, we're losing value.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFatigue
· 12-07 10:48
To be honest, this point is spot on. DeFi is like a giant split personality patient—funds keep shuffling back and forth between protocols, and it’s just a bloodbath.
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 12-07 10:47
To be honest, I’ve wanted to complain about this for a while. DeFi is just a bunch of fragmented pieces stitched together right now, with extremely low capital efficiency. The Prime architecture is the right idea, but when it comes to execution... well, it really depends on how the Astros tackle this tough challenge.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 12-07 10:45
That's right, DeFi is a huge maze right now, with funds moving around and transaction fees bleeding everywhere. I really like the Prime architecture approach—someone really needs to integrate all this.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskVictim
· 12-07 10:33
Money dances between various protocols, and every time it jumps, it loses a layer... To be honest, this round of Astros’ approach really hits the mark.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 12-07 10:28
Thinking about this yet again... To be honest, the moment funds start dancing between protocols, I'm already at a huge loss before I can even react. The logic behind the Prime architecture sounds nice, but I'm worried it's just another APY screenshot scam.
Recently, I noticed a rather interesting perspective—what is the true bottleneck for on-chain capital?
Many people focus on AMMs and lending protocols, but in reality, the most critical issue is the underlying capital efficiency. DeFi strategies are too fragmented right now: lending is just lending, trading is just trading, and your funds have to jump between various protocols, losing value with every move.
Astros' proposed Prime architecture is actually quite straightforward—it aims to break this isolated state. Instead of having funds constantly bounce between different platforms, it's better to reconstruct the logic from the ground up.