There's a world of difference between someone struggling to grasp every technical nuance of a complex protocol and having to walk back a statement—versus deliberately twisting facts to cover up your own questionable competitive moves. One's an honest mistake. The other? That's a choice. The crypto space thrives on transparency and good faith. When protocol details get weaponized to shield anti-competitive behavior, it erodes trust across the board. We've all seen projects bend narratives when cornered. But reframing genuine technical confusion as intentional sabotage? That's crossing a line. Hope we can all raise the bar here.