BTC dropped to around $89,000, and a bunch of coin-hoarding companies got blown up.
Metaplanet is having the worst time. In October, they still had a paper profit of over $600 million, but now they're down $530 million. Nakamoto’s average cost is above $118,000 per coin, and their unrealized loss has already exceeded $180 million. The stock price has plunged more than 95% from its peak—basically chopped all the way down to the ankles. Semler Scientific isn’t doing well either, with a cost basis of $95,000 per BTC and paper losses surpassing $50 million.
Aside from those top companies, things are even tougher for other small and mid-sized players. This correction came fast and hard, and the institutions that bought the top are now under serious pressure. Market sentiment has taken a nosedive, and the tug-of-war between holding conviction and actual losses is testing every participant’s patience.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SwapWhisperer
· 12-07 06:09
Haha, now this is getting interesting. In October they were still showing off their paper profits, and in a flash, it turned into a total bloodbath.
Metaplanet's move is insane—making 600 million and then immediately losing 530 million, it's just that ridiculous.
The institutions that bought in at the top are really stuck in hell right now.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 12-07 06:09
Those who bought at the top are all going through a real psychological test.
---
Metaplanet went from making 600 million to losing 530 million, what a dramatic turnaround.
---
What happened to the promised conviction? Now it's all shattered by unrealized losses.
---
A 95% drop... this guy must have incredible stress tolerance.
---
How can small and mid-size players survive? It's really unbearable.
---
For those whose cost price is still sky-high, how long will it take to break even?
---
Holding coin conviction vs. account losses, who's winning now?
---
Here comes another round of corrections, when will it ever end?
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidator
· 12-07 06:02
Institutions that bought at the top are now learning a lesson—the numbers on paper mean nothing without sufficient node decentralization and consensus mechanisms to support them. This recent drop doesn't expose a problem with BTC itself, but rather the vulnerability of those centralized coin-hoarding strategies.
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurker
· 12-07 05:58
Damn, this is what happens when you buy at the top.
Another wave of retail investors has been harvested.
Metaplanet’s reversal speed is insane...
How much is faith worth anyway? Recovering losses is what matters.
When you can't hold on anymore, that's when you find out who's been swimming naked.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 12-07 05:49
According to on-chain data, Metaplanet's net profit swung from a positive $600 million directly to a negative $530 million... This basically confirms the systemic risk of institutions buying in at high levels. It's worth noting that Nakamoto's cost basis at $118,000 is now facing an unrealized loss of $180 million, with the stock price slashed to the ankle—this level of drawdown is already beyond what traditional financial risk control models can explain.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastingMaximalist
· 12-07 05:40
It was clear that hoarding crypto companies would have to pay their debts sooner or later, so it's no surprise that they're all collapsing now.
BTC dropped to around $89,000, and a bunch of coin-hoarding companies got blown up.
Metaplanet is having the worst time. In October, they still had a paper profit of over $600 million, but now they're down $530 million. Nakamoto’s average cost is above $118,000 per coin, and their unrealized loss has already exceeded $180 million. The stock price has plunged more than 95% from its peak—basically chopped all the way down to the ankles. Semler Scientific isn’t doing well either, with a cost basis of $95,000 per BTC and paper losses surpassing $50 million.
Aside from those top companies, things are even tougher for other small and mid-sized players. This correction came fast and hard, and the institutions that bought the top are now under serious pressure. Market sentiment has taken a nosedive, and the tug-of-war between holding conviction and actual losses is testing every participant’s patience.