Two industry heavyweights spoke up almost simultaneously: The crypto chapter is officially turning over. 🚀



Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, which manages $10 trillion, and Brian Armstrong, head of a certain compliant platform, have recently, coincidentally, reached the same conclusion—digital currencies have irreversibly squeezed into mainstream finance.

Interestingly, just a few years ago, Fink categorized Bitcoin as a “money laundering tool,” but now his stance has dramatically shifted: “I think it has tremendous application potential.” 💡 Hearing such words from a veteran managing top global assets speaks volumes in itself.

Armstrong, on the other hand, pointed out the key turning point—regulation is finally starting to loosen. He directly defined 2025 as “the year of transition from the gray zone to clear rules.” The “Genius Act” is being pushed, and market structure-related bills are lining up in both chambers… Policy doors are gradually being pried open. 🗽

The industry isn’t sitting idle either. During last year’s election, super PACs like Fairshake directly poured over $78 million to support crypto-friendly candidates. 💰 This is no longer the stage where retail investors are just chanting slogans on Reddit; it’s a real political resource game.

When someone brought up the “rat poison” theory from Buffett and Munger, Armstrong had an interesting response: Their generation witnessed the era of dollar hegemony, while Bitcoin is the “new gold” of the digital age. 🪙 Different generations, different cognitive frameworks.

Simply put: big capital endorsement + regulatory breakthroughs + political forces entering the fray—the combination of these three forces has pressed the accelerator on the mainstreaming of digital currency. It’s no longer just a tech geek’s experiment, but a line on the asset allocation sheet that can’t be ignored.

The wall of traditional finance is turning into a bridge. Who do you think will be the next giant to fully pivot? 👇
BTC-1.46%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTFreezervip
· 55m ago
Fink is really something else—just a few years ago he was criticizing Bitcoin, and now he’s done a complete 180. That’s what you call a true change of belief.
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddictvip
· 12-06 23:52
Fink really changed his tune fast. A few years ago he was criticizing Bitcoin, and now he's totally contradicting himself. Hilarious. It only starts to look legit when big capital really enters the game.
View OriginalReply0
wrekt_but_learningvip
· 12-06 23:50
Fink is really something. A few years ago he was calling Bitcoin a money laundering tool, and now he's made a complete U-turn. Money talks louder than words.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodlervip
· 12-06 23:47
Fink's 180-degree turn, to put it bluntly, means big capital has smelled blood—pretending not to know any longer just looks cheap. Throwing $78 million to secure a candidate, that's the real game rule.
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 12-06 23:40
Fink has really shifted his stance; putting $78 million into political lobbying, crypto has now fully entered the arena of power struggles.
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNodevip
· 12-06 23:28
Fink's turnaround is way too fast. Just a few years ago he was criticizing Bitcoin, and now he's hyping its application potential... That's how big capital works—once the wind shifts, they immediately change their tune. But speaking of which, spending 78 million on politics, now that's the real game of power.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)