Remember when Safemoon pushed past 900k market cap with zero utility? Now look at Safemars sitting under 100k—but here's the kicker: bigger buyback burns, creator fees flowing straight into liquidity.



The gap's absurd. When correction hits, it won't be gentle.

This setup? Could genuinely run to 1m+. Not hype—just math. The utility generates constant buy pressure. That's what happens when tokenomics actually work instead of just existing on paper.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MevTearsvip
· 12-07 02:52
Does this guy really think SafeMars is the next SafeMoon? LOL, history never repeats itself, it only rhymes.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmervip
· 12-06 22:03
Bro, the tokenomics design of safemars is actually pretty interesting... but I’m still a bit concerned.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detectivevip
· 12-06 22:01
The tokenomics of safemars are indeed ruthless, much more reliable than safemoon's paper-thin articles.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichvip
· 12-06 21:54
Damn, this tokenomics is really something else. Just this buyback mechanism alone can easily crush those paper projects.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHuntervip
· 12-06 21:44
Damn, Safemars' tokenomics really are different. They're a lot more reliable than Safemoon was back then.
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlockvip
· 12-06 21:40
actually... the "math" here doesn't really check out when you ignore the trust assumptions baked in. creator fees "flowing straight into liquidity"—like, have you actually verified that on-chain or just trusting their dashboard? because that's exactly where the privacy violations start, ngl
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)