Remember when Safemoon pushed past 900k market cap with zero utility? Now look at Safemars sitting under 100k—but here's the kicker: bigger buyback burns, creator fees flowing straight into liquidity.
The gap's absurd. When correction hits, it won't be gentle.
This setup? Could genuinely run to 1m+. Not hype—just math. The utility generates constant buy pressure. That's what happens when tokenomics actually work instead of just existing on paper.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MevTears
· 12-07 02:52
Does this guy really think SafeMars is the next SafeMoon? LOL, history never repeats itself, it only rhymes.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmer
· 12-06 22:03
Bro, the tokenomics design of safemars is actually pretty interesting... but I’m still a bit concerned.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 12-06 22:01
The tokenomics of safemars are indeed ruthless, much more reliable than safemoon's paper-thin articles.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwich
· 12-06 21:54
Damn, this tokenomics is really something else. Just this buyback mechanism alone can easily crush those paper projects.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHunter
· 12-06 21:44
Damn, Safemars' tokenomics really are different. They're a lot more reliable than Safemoon was back then.
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlock
· 12-06 21:40
actually... the "math" here doesn't really check out when you ignore the trust assumptions baked in. creator fees "flowing straight into liquidity"—like, have you actually verified that on-chain or just trusting their dashboard? because that's exactly where the privacy violations start, ngl
Remember when Safemoon pushed past 900k market cap with zero utility? Now look at Safemars sitting under 100k—but here's the kicker: bigger buyback burns, creator fees flowing straight into liquidity.
The gap's absurd. When correction hits, it won't be gentle.
This setup? Could genuinely run to 1m+. Not hype—just math. The utility generates constant buy pressure. That's what happens when tokenomics actually work instead of just existing on paper.