A leading DEX had an outrageous parameter configuration mistake, which directly drained 99% of the funds from the "Get Rich Soon" and "Instant Fortune" liquidity pools. The real kicker came afterward—they immediately dumped "Get Rich Soon," causing the token to crash, while tens of thousands of holders watched their account balances evaporate.



This move is practically a textbook on-chain negative case study. However, the community's reaction has been pretty resilient: "Thanks for this heavy blow—it exposed the true nature of centralized risk." Some are already rallying for the Year of the Horse in 2026, calling to revive meme culture and prove through real action that the spirit of decentralization is alive and well.

Honestly, DeFi code risks are always a Sword of Damocles hanging overhead. This incident is another reminder for everyone: don’t put all your eggs in one smart contract, no matter how awesome it looks.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsShamanvip
· 12h ago
99% of the funds are gone just like that. This move is definitely ruthless, but honestly, guys, it's time to learn the lesson. --- Damn, it's the same old "thanks for the critical hit" line again. Give me a break—if it were truly decentralized, how could a single parameter mistake cause such a collapse? --- The pool evaporated overnight. This is exactly why I never put all my assets into a single contract. --- Will we get back on our feet in the Year of the Horse 2026? Let's just try to survive until then. There are endless pitfalls on-chain. --- So we finally see the real face of centralized risk, and in the end, we still get rekt. It's a bit ironic, isn't it? --- That's why they say code is law, and bugs are law too. There's no such thing as absolute safety in DeFi. --- Tens of thousands of users watching their balances evaporate together—how hopeless must that be? If it were me, I'd be numb by now. --- Don't put all your eggs in one basket. How many times has that been said? Yet people still don't listen.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghostvip
· 12-06 09:54
Ha, a parameter misconfiguration? This is a top project? LOL --- 99% is gone just like that, and they still call themselves a top project? --- Another on-chain tragedy, huh? Has no one learned to diversify risk? --- The community's "thanks for the critical hit" narrative is wild, really wild. --- Bounce back in the Year of the Horse 2026? Wake up, bro, this is just a casino. --- Code is just code, no sword of Damocles here—it's just that the wallet is empty. --- How can a parameter configuration be this absurd... I don't believe it was just a mistake. --- Tens of thousands of user accounts evaporated, and we’re still supposed to say thanks? Seriously? --- The more "powerful" a smart contract, the faster it dies—when will this pattern change? --- If you put all your chips in one pool, you asked for it.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatchervip
· 12-06 09:53
99% evaporated instantly, this operation is honestly ridiculously absurd. LOL, making such a flashy move just because of a parameter error—really have to give DEX full marks for creativity. Man, anyone who still dares to go all in on a single pool now is a real warrior. Wait, the name "Get Rich Soon" is honestly pretty fitting right now. Yet another on-chain bloodbath—when will people finally learn their lesson? I have to hand it to the community for still getting hyped; I’ve been numb to this for a while. This is what they call "code doesn’t lie," but operations can. DeFi is always a casino, the only difference is the gambling table is on the blockchain. Honestly, I feel a bit sorry for those new retail investors—they haven’t learned anything yet and already got taught a hard lesson.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 12-06 09:50
Getting rich in no time, losing it just as fast—this move is really something else. --- Is it another parameter configuration bug? There should have been risk control audits a long time ago. --- Just pulling out 99% should have been enough, but they even dumped the tokens—what kind of move is that? --- All the savvy ones are saying 2026 Year of the Horse is when we bounce back, but I just want to know who’s going to make up for my losses. --- Code risks are really impossible to guard against. Is it my fault for being too greedy? --- Seeing through centralized risks? It’s really just seeing through the character of certain people. --- I’m tired of hearing about the “don’t put all your eggs in one basket” theory. The problem is, no one truly believes it. --- Another batch of “how to fleece the newbies” tutorial videos is out. Honestly, this time they explained it pretty clearly. --- What’s the point of a tough community? The money in your account is what really matters, and now it’s all gone. --- DeFi is always going through cycles of “I’m never playing again,” and then everyone keeps playing.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemistvip
· 12-06 09:42
99% taken away? Dude, what kind of outrageous config could cause this to happen? Bitcoin just taught us another lesson—"code is law" is no joke. Money comes fast, goes bankrupt just as fast. Hilarious—it's really "immediate." What are you waiting for until 2026? You need to diversify your risk now, man—don’t wait for the next disaster. This is why I never all in on a single pool—way too damn risky. These crash-and-burn stories happen every year, yet people never seem to learn. So much for decentralization—turns out parameter settings can still choke you. Damn, tens of thousands of user accounts wiped out—that’s gotta make a lot of people cry. Centralization risk? I'd say this is more like basic bug risk. Thanks to this incident, we got another free lesson on risk management.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)