To be honest, people who have experienced a full bull-bear cycle now have a conditioned reflex to be wary whenever they hear terms like "yield generation" or "financial management." After all, they've suffered too many losses—those projects that promise an annualized return of 20%, 50%, or even more outrageous fixed returns, without exception, end up targeting your principal as their next harvest.
The iron rule of this market is actually very simple: for any protocol that can't clearly explain where the money comes from, chances are it's eyeing the savings in your wallet. Having seen enough Ponzi schemes, my first reaction to high-yield promises is no longer to rush in, but to ask three questions—What are the underlying assets? Does the yield logic hold up? Where does the liquidity come from?
So when I recently noticed a new staking protocol, the first thing I did wasn't to check how high the APY was, but to look at what exactly was written in the whitepaper.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWrangler
· 10h ago
technically speaking, if you actually trace the cash flows in these staking protocols... most of them are just ponzi mechanics wrapped in fancy smart contract code. the math doesn't check out when you run the numbers through mempool analysis.
Reply0
MetaverseVagrant
· 12-06 06:53
Honestly, I start sweating as soon as I hear "yield farming."
View OriginalReply0
NewPumpamentals
· 12-06 06:51
Whitepapers are all deceptive; the key is whether there are real users actually using it.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 12-06 06:50
It took suffering so many losses to finally understand that high returns are just another name for high risk—no exceptions.
50% annualized return? Ha, isn’t that just asking me if I want to go all in on a suicide mission?
No matter how good the whitepaper looks, it’s useless if the underlying logic isn’t self-consistent—otherwise, it’s just hot air.
I’ve seen too many projects where the team gets something for nothing; now whenever I hear the word "yield," I just want to run.
It really comes down to three questions—Where does the money come from? How is it earned? Can you cash out? If you can’t get clear answers, don’t get involved.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 12-06 06:49
I should have exited when the annualized rate hit 20%, but I didn't, and now I'm still on the liquidation list, haha.
If I can't tell where the money is coming from, I'll kill it on sight.
As for whitepapers, I've memorized all the tricks scammers use.
Another new staking protocol? Let's first see what Dragonfly and a16z have to say.
Ponzi schemes are evolving too fast—since the beginning of the year, the scams have already reached version five.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullTherapist
· 12-06 06:45
Honestly, whenever I hear "50% APY," my mind immediately goes into defense mode.
To be honest, people who have experienced a full bull-bear cycle now have a conditioned reflex to be wary whenever they hear terms like "yield generation" or "financial management." After all, they've suffered too many losses—those projects that promise an annualized return of 20%, 50%, or even more outrageous fixed returns, without exception, end up targeting your principal as their next harvest.
The iron rule of this market is actually very simple: for any protocol that can't clearly explain where the money comes from, chances are it's eyeing the savings in your wallet. Having seen enough Ponzi schemes, my first reaction to high-yield promises is no longer to rush in, but to ask three questions—What are the underlying assets? Does the yield logic hold up? Where does the liquidity come from?
So when I recently noticed a new staking protocol, the first thing I did wasn't to check how high the APY was, but to look at what exactly was written in the whitepaper.