Look, schools need to get smart about AI tutoring. Where it's actually delivering results? Use it. The data doesn't lie—personalized learning algorithms can adapt to individual students in ways traditional classrooms simply can't match.
But here's the catch everyone seems to be missing: we can't let this turn into an excuse to automate everything. There's a reason robots haven't replaced teachers yet. Critical thinking? Creativity? The messy, unpredictable parts of human learning that make us, well, human? Those need MORE focus now, not less.
The schools getting this right aren't choosing between tech and traditional teaching. They're doubling down on what machines suck at while letting AI handle the repetitive stuff. That's the play.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TopEscapeArtist
· 19h ago
Here we go again with the same old AI education narrative. To put it bluntly, it's still about seeing whether the technicals can support this rebound in education technology... Just because the data looks good, does that mean we have to use it? I'm just asking, without any human touch, can this thing really form a sustained upward trend? It's easy for the MACD to form a death cross.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoComedian
· 19h ago
Data speaks, but in the classroom, what truly dazzles people are still the things that machines can't learn... Laughing and then suddenly crying, once again forced to pick a side.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTrader
· 19h ago
To be honest, the whole AI tutor thing really depends on how it's used. The data is there—personalized learning is definitely better than large classroom models… but the problem is, you can’t just go fully automated just because the technology is new. Creative thinking, critical thinking—these are things robots will never be able to handle. You need to find a balance.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_early
· 19h ago
Honestly, when it comes to AI tutoring, it's really about finding that balance—don't rush to fully automate everything.
But to be honest, what I care more about are those creative thinking aspects... AI really can't handle that part.
That's where schools should really focus their efforts: let technology handle repetitive tasks, and let humans provide teaching with warmth.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsCriminal
· 19h ago
To put it simply, don't treat AI as a cure-all, but also don't stubbornly insist on using chalk to teach advanced mathematics... Let machines handle the tasks that can save effort, and humans should be even more serious about the things they need to do.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMiner
· 20h ago
That's right, but how many schools are actually using AI properly now? Most of them are still just going through the motions.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 20h ago
ngl this is the truth, AI should just do what AI is supposed to do. Don’t think a single algorithm can fix education—that would be so boring.
Look, schools need to get smart about AI tutoring. Where it's actually delivering results? Use it. The data doesn't lie—personalized learning algorithms can adapt to individual students in ways traditional classrooms simply can't match.
But here's the catch everyone seems to be missing: we can't let this turn into an excuse to automate everything. There's a reason robots haven't replaced teachers yet. Critical thinking? Creativity? The messy, unpredictable parts of human learning that make us, well, human? Those need MORE focus now, not less.
The schools getting this right aren't choosing between tech and traditional teaching. They're doubling down on what machines suck at while letting AI handle the repetitive stuff. That's the play.