2025-12-05 16:01:00

#特朗普数字资产政策新方向 $ZEC $BTC

Recently noticed the Conan project—the "hero dog" publicly named by Trump.

What's interesting about it? It's not just about riding the hype. They're developing a blockchain game and aim to create real token utility within the game environment, which is much more solid than just hyping up a concept. The contract is hard-coded to prevent additional issuance, with a capped supply, so they've got scarcity locked down.

There's also a clever move: they've established an annual "Hero Dog Memorial Day," which definitely helps with community cohesion.

Of course, the attention brought by a top-tier IP is one thing, but turning that attention into long-term value is another matter. Still, judging by their roadmap, it's a lot clearer than those projects that just shout slogans. Is it worth paying attention to? That's for you to decide.

ZEC9.51%

BTC2.57%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SadMoneyMeow

· 6h ago

Alright, this time it’s not just pure Dogecoin hype—using chain game consumption is indeed more reliable than a pure Ponzi scheme. Damn, the no additional issuance part really nails it; scarcity is basically forced into existence. That anniversary community move, that’s some clever scheming. But the real issue is traffic conversion... what happened with the last batch of IP projects again?

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekNewSickle

· 21h ago

I've heard the rhetoric about token consumption in blockchain games quite a few times already. In the end, it still comes down to whether there are real users willing to pay. Fixed supply sounds nice on paper, but when it comes time to dump, they can just tweak the contract anyway... Those who know, know.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHomeless

· 12-05 16:31

The logic of token consumption in blockchain games sounds appealing, but there are very few projects that can actually make it work. Converting traffic into value depends on future execution—not every project riding the hype can survive the next bear market. The anniversary move is indeed brilliant; community stickiness is more important than anything else. Hardcoding the contract to prevent additional issuance sounds great, but there's always the risk of indirect dilution later on. Is it worth paying attention to? Ask me again in three months. Getting involved now is pretty much like gambling.

View OriginalReply0

BlindBoxVictim

· 12-05 16:30

This hero dog’s approach of developing blockchain games is indeed better than just riding the hype. The “no additional token issuance” aspect is actually quite interesting.

View OriginalReply0

PonziWhisperer

· 12-05 16:17

Yeah, I've seen this kind of play a lot—IP + blockchain game + community operations. Sounds okay, but it's hard to say how long they can stick with it. Feels like it's better to wait until their blockchain game actually launches before judging. Anything said now is too early. Not issuing more tokens is definitely a good point, at least you won't get diluted to death.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekConfession

· 12-05 16:12

I've heard about the token consumption model in blockchain games several times already. The key is still whether the team is reliable or not. Not issuing more tokens does make it scarce, but there are plenty of projects with capped supply that still go to zero. That anniversary event is pretty creative, but strong community cohesion ≠ price increase, don't get it mixed up. Trump can pump it up with a single comment and crash it down just as easily. You have to factor in that risk. Anyway, I'm just watching the show for now, and I'll wait until the blockchain game actually launches.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 12-05 16:10

I've seen the playbook of token consumption in blockchain games too many times—it always ends up being just a front for fleecing users. No additional issuance and a capped supply sounds good, but I'm worried that when it comes to future governance votes, there might be a "community resolution" that changes things. The anniversary gimmick is indeed clever, but it's hard to say how long it can actually last.

View OriginalReply0

GlueGuy

· 12-05 16:01

The logic of consuming tokens in blockchain games sounds pretty good, but I’m just worried it’s all talk again. This IP traffic is indeed impressive, but the real test is whether it can be converted into value. The annual anniversary move is actually pretty clever; it really can boost community activity. I believe in the capped supply with no additional issuance, but the key is whether they can keep coming up with new ideas. Wait, is this another Trump concept? It’s wild how everything is trying to tie itself to him these days.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#FedRateCutPrediction
3.65K Popularity
#SUIETFLaunched
810 Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
733 Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
33K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
84.39K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
CANDYcandy
MC:$3.55KHolders:1
0.00%
2
GEMZGemz
MC:$3.62KHolders:2
0.51%
3
GAll in Web3
MC:$4KHolders:2
2.06%
4
GAll in Web3
MC:$3.54KHolders:1
0.00%
5
GHOSTGhost
MC:$3.79KHolders:2
1.26%

Sitemap