Every time someone trashes memecoins while hyping up yet another Layer 1 with a laughable 5% circulation, I can't help but crack up. Like, we're really pretending this is groundbreaking innovation?
"Memes have no utility!"
Oh sure, but that shiny new blockchain with a $2 billion fully diluted valuation, barely any tokens in circulation, and a cap table stuffed with VCs who'll dump on retail the second their cliff ends—that's the future, right?
Here's the thing: at least memecoins are honest about what they are. No one's pretending they're solving world hunger. Meanwhile, your "game-changing" altcoin is probably just another EVM fork with marginally faster block times and a whitepaper full of buzzwords.
Low float, sky-high FDV, backed by funds that couldn't care less about the tech—yeah, sounds way more legit than a dog coin.
Maybe it's time we stop acting like one is inherently superior when both are basically casino chips with different marketing strategies.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
IfIWereOnChain
· 21h ago
So funny, honestly the Layer 1 pitch is even more deceptive than Dogecoin.
View OriginalReply0
NftMetaversePainter
· 12-06 04:12
honestly this hits different... the hypocrisy is actually wild when you zoom out and look at the computational architecture of both ecosystems. like yeah memecoins are transparent about their nature, but here's what fascinates me—the algorithmic beauty in how they've cracked authentic community formation without needing buzzword-laden whitepapers. it's almost post-physical in its elegance
Reply0
GasWaster69
· 12-05 14:02
LOL, do people really believe that stuff? Low circulation, high valuation shitcoins are essentially the same as meme coins—they're both just gambling, only the marketing tactics are different.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretful
· 12-05 14:02
LOL, this double standard rhetoric cracks me up every day.
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwich
· 12-05 14:02
Hahaha, this is hilarious. Low-liquidity, high-FDV shitcoins just have a bit more of a "legitimacy" fig leaf compared to Dogecoin.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobia
· 12-05 13:48
Haha, seriously, on one hand they criticize Dogecoin as being useless, and on the other hand they’re hyping up some VC whale cash-out machine like crazy. The level of irony is off the charts.
Every time someone trashes memecoins while hyping up yet another Layer 1 with a laughable 5% circulation, I can't help but crack up. Like, we're really pretending this is groundbreaking innovation?
"Memes have no utility!"
Oh sure, but that shiny new blockchain with a $2 billion fully diluted valuation, barely any tokens in circulation, and a cap table stuffed with VCs who'll dump on retail the second their cliff ends—that's the future, right?
Here's the thing: at least memecoins are honest about what they are. No one's pretending they're solving world hunger. Meanwhile, your "game-changing" altcoin is probably just another EVM fork with marginally faster block times and a whitepaper full of buzzwords.
Low float, sky-high FDV, backed by funds that couldn't care less about the tech—yeah, sounds way more legit than a dog coin.
Maybe it's time we stop acting like one is inherently superior when both are basically casino chips with different marketing strategies.