Recently, a heavyweight figure mentioned the concept of Robotics, and the market exploded instantly. To be honest, whenever this sector is mentioned, the first project that comes to my mind is OpenMind.
It’s been on my watch list for a long time. Every time the topic of Robotics comes up, OpenMind is bound to be discussed.
But what sets it apart?
The key point—OpenMind is taking a completely different route from traditional hardware manufacturers. The robotics companies in the US stock market focus on production lines and components, but OpenMind is targeting the AI and decentralization space. This difference in positioning is the core reason why it can stand firm in this wave of narratives.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoHistoryClass
· 2h ago
ah, here we go again with the "this time is different" robotics thesis... *checks historical charts* statistically speaking, every ai narrative pivot since 2017 started exactly like this lmao
Reply0
FUDwatcher
· 23h ago
Uh... The AI + decentralized bot sector sounds pretty hype, but I’m still a bit skeptical.
Can OpenMind really outperform those traditional big companies? It feels like the narrative is easy, but actual implementation is tough.
Every time I see projects like this, I’m reminded of previous failed cases. It’s not wrong to be cautious.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMaster
· 12-05 04:55
Hmm... OpenMind's decentralized AI approach is indeed quite interesting, but will those hardware players in the US stock market really be wiped out?
Wait, how long can this robotics narrative last? I'm worried it might just be another passing trend.
Even if OpenMind gains a foothold, it's not guaranteed; the key still lies in real-world implementation. Just telling stories isn't enough.
I admit this positioning is novel, but could it just be more concept hype? Needs to be watched.
AI plus decentralization does sound like it offers more imagination than pure hardware companies.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7
· 12-05 04:54
Hey, this angle is pretty fresh. AI combined with decentralization is definitely sexier than just piling on hardware.
But wait, isn’t this logic a bit over-marketed? As soon as the topic of robotics comes up, does it always have to be discussed?
Honestly, it still depends on whether it can actually be implemented. No matter how appealing the concept is, if users don’t buy in, it’s useless.
I’ve heard about this for a while, but there aren’t many who actually dare to go all in, right?
It’s definitely a different approach, but could it just be another old trick from the crypto space...
How long this robotics hype can last is key. Hope it doesn’t just end up being another flash in the pan.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 12-05 04:53
ngl the ai + decentral angle is where the real value extraction happens... traditional robotics plays are just constrained by capex friction tbh
Reply0
ProposalManiac
· 12-05 04:51
Alright, this positioning difference is definitely something to watch. But the key is how well this decentralized incentive mechanism is designed—can it really be self-sustaining?
---
AI plus decentralization sounds great, but historically, most hybrid projects like this have failed due to the balance-of-power game in decentralization. The real test is how efficient OpenMind's governance is.
---
The production line logic of the US stock market is rigid. If OpenMind’s community-driven model can actually work, that’s the real deal—otherwise, it’s just a new narrative for the same old hype.
---
Wait, has its proposal process and community consensus mechanism been made public? That’s the real litmus test for whether it’s truly "decentralized."
---
Seriously, is OpenMind genuinely trying to do something different this time, or is it just repeating the same mistakes as those Robotics projects? I want to see real data.
---
I agree with the differentiated positioning, but you have to ask if the mechanism design can achieve incentive compatibility—otherwise, no matter how powerful the AI or how thorough the decentralization, it’s all for nothing.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 12-05 04:36
Hmm... The AI + decentralization angle does have some substance, but can robotics really get hyped up just by the narrative?
---
OpenMind’s move is decent, but it depends on whether it can actually be implemented. Just having a concept makes it easy to become someone else’s exit liquidity.
---
Wait, why don’t those US stock robotics companies also try decentralized AI? Is this difference a real advantage or just marketing hype?
---
Been following these projects for so long with no real action—how much longer do we have to wait this time...
---
Honestly, just mentioning which side is heavier or lighter can cause a market crash—this is just how things are now.
---
Cake-cutting sounds fierce, but how much you can actually carve out is what really matters.
---
Can the robotics hype last until OpenMind actually makes progress? I’m a bit worried it’ll be short-lived.
---
Decentralized robots sound great, but it still feels like real-world application is a long way off.
Recently, a heavyweight figure mentioned the concept of Robotics, and the market exploded instantly. To be honest, whenever this sector is mentioned, the first project that comes to my mind is OpenMind.
It’s been on my watch list for a long time. Every time the topic of Robotics comes up, OpenMind is bound to be discussed.
But what sets it apart?
The key point—OpenMind is taking a completely different route from traditional hardware manufacturers. The robotics companies in the US stock market focus on production lines and components, but OpenMind is targeting the AI and decentralization space. This difference in positioning is the core reason why it can stand firm in this wave of narratives.