That Blockchain Week in Dubai is still ongoing. On stage, macro analyst Raoul Pal made an encouraging remark—that 2026 will see a “super liquidity cycle.” According to him, this current downturn is just a breather in the middle of the bull market; the real main surge hasn’t arrived yet.
Sounds great, right? But outside the venue, the market sentiment isn’t nearly as optimistic.
Let’s start with the debate that just ended. CZ and gold diehard Peter Schiff went head-to-head: one argued that Bitcoin’s value comes from the consensus of hundreds of millions of users worldwide, while the other insisted that gold is the only true hard currency. Interestingly, after their argument, they actually talked about potential cooperation—maybe that’s a kind of tacit understanding between the old and new forces.
Now, let’s look at the data. ETH is currently stuck in a liquidation cluster exceeding $1.3 billion, with both bulls and bears squeezed together—a small move could trigger a chain of liquidations. If you still dare to add leverage at this point, you must have a strong heart. Pal also warned earlier: don’t play too aggressively.
There’s also been a strange incident recently—MEME coin PEPE’s official website was hacked. Even though MEME coins are high-risk to begin with, this incident has poured cold water on the market. Even more surprising, some have observed that VCs are starting to use traditional financial metrics like “price-to-sales ratio” to evaluate crypto assets. This kind of overly rational behavior often signals that sentiment has hit rock bottom.
So, the current situation is highly divided:
On the surface, big players are painting grand liquidity blueprints; Within the industry, supporters of old and new assets are still debating fundamental logic; On the charts, high leverage, security vulnerabilities, and extreme pessimism are intertwined.
Historically, those truly major cycles never start smoothly amidst cheers. They always take shape slowly in the midst of chaos, division, and repeated testing.
What do you think? Is this the “mid-bull correction” Pal mentioned, or is it an even more complex phase? Share your thoughts in the comments.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunterWang
· 12-07 22:20
The 1.3 billion liquidation zone is really scary. I’m just watching quietly, too afraid to make a move.
---
Pal is telling stories again. Anyway, I don’t buy that 2026 narrative. Let’s just get through this year first.
---
The PEPE official website getting hacked is hilarious. MEME coin players need to wake up.
---
VCs using price-to-sales ratio? Ha, they’re starting to copy traditional finance, which just shows they’re really scared.
---
CZ and Peter can still work together after arguing—only in this industry. What kind of weird tacit understanding is that?
---
Using leverage right now is suicidal, with that 1.3 billion just sitting there.
---
Honestly, it’s just anxiety. No matter how good things sound on the surface, the charts don’t lie.
---
I don’t think we’ve hit bottom yet. Let it get messy for a while longer.
---
The gold vs Bitcoin debate is so outdated. When both are going up, no one’s wrong.
---
That part about historical cycles makes sense, but don’t use it as a reason to take on more leverage.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerGas
· 12-07 21:42
$1.3 billion liquidation zone directly adding leverage, this mentality is really... It's the chicken game in game theory.
Are VCs starting to look at price-to-sales ratios? That means retail investors have already been panic selling.
Raoul is telling stories on stage, but on-chain data is saying the opposite—this kind of disconnect is often the most dangerous signal.
PEPE’s official website getting hacked is actually a good thing; at least it serves as a wake-up call for these purely speculative assets.
No matter how massive the liquidity in 2026 is, it can't fill the hole left this year... Right now it feels more like rational despair after an irrational drop.
View OriginalReply0
Web3ExplorerLin
· 12-06 01:46
hypothesis: the stage we're in rn isn't just consolidation—it's more like a byzantine generals problem where everyone's pretending consensus exists but nobody actually trusts the messaging layer...
honestly pepe's website getting hacked while vcs measuring market cap/revenue like it's a traditional startup? that's peak "decentralized future" theater ngl
Reply0
ForkTongue
· 12-04 22:49
So many big shots bragging over there, but the $1.3 billion liquidation zone is right in front of us—cracks me up.
Anyone leveraging up is a real warrior. Just wait for the liquidation notice, then you’ll know what a "real main uptrend" is.
PEPE’s official website getting hacked probably hints at something, doesn’t it?
No matter how good the 2026 story sounds, let's just see who survives this year into the next.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 12-04 22:44
The super liquidity cycle in 2026? Just give it to me straight—right now, ETH’s liquidation zone feels like a ticking time bomb.
Feels like VCs have started valuing coins by price-to-sales ratio, which honestly means it’s time to chill out a bit.
The Pepe exploit is just ridiculous—no matter how big the project, you’ve got to protect against basic security vulnerabilities.
CZ and Schiff are even talking about collaborating in the end. That hint of new versus old power dynamics is pretty interesting.
Anyway, I don’t dare to leverage up anymore—just going to wait and see.
Being too pessimistic or too optimistic both get you wrecked; right now, it’s really all about keeping your cool.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmer
· 12-04 22:38
Stories about 2026 are just for listening, but this $1.3 billion liquidation level right now is what's truly deadly.
Raoul Pal is spinning stories again. I believe him, but the market clearly doesn't.
The PEPE official website being hacked, in a way, shows that the VCs are really panicking and starting to comfort themselves with traditional finance tricks.
It's hard enough without leverage, let alone in this situation—those with guts either make a killing or lose big.
The big shots talk about liquidity on stage, while retail investors are sweating bullets in their accounts. Why is the gap so huge?
At this point, whether it's a correction or the bottom, holding tokens just feels tough anyway.
View OriginalReply0
MechanicalMartel
· 12-04 22:36
Listening to Pal boast, then looking at the 1.3 billion liquidation cluster holding steady—this contrast cracks me up.
---
2026 super liquidity? Bro, let’s just survive this year first.
---
PEPE’s official website getting hacked shows one thing: MEME coins really do need to chill.
---
VCs are starting to use price-to-sales ratios to evaluate crypto assets… Is this a dimensionality reduction strike or are they finally waking up?
---
CZ and Peter Schiff are actually talking about cooperation—old and new forces, this is really interesting.
---
High leverage + security vulnerabilities + pessimistic sentiment, this combo punch is coming.
---
The underlying logic isn’t even settled yet, and they’re already drawing big plans for 2026—getting a bit ahead of themselves.
---
I think this is truly the darkest hour before dawn, or maybe it’ll keep dropping, who knows.
---
That advice about not adding leverage is actually legit—Pal wasn’t talking nonsense this time.
---
Chaos and division intertwined—man, this is truly the prelude to a major historical cycle.
That Blockchain Week in Dubai is still ongoing. On stage, macro analyst Raoul Pal made an encouraging remark—that 2026 will see a “super liquidity cycle.” According to him, this current downturn is just a breather in the middle of the bull market; the real main surge hasn’t arrived yet.
Sounds great, right? But outside the venue, the market sentiment isn’t nearly as optimistic.
Let’s start with the debate that just ended. CZ and gold diehard Peter Schiff went head-to-head: one argued that Bitcoin’s value comes from the consensus of hundreds of millions of users worldwide, while the other insisted that gold is the only true hard currency. Interestingly, after their argument, they actually talked about potential cooperation—maybe that’s a kind of tacit understanding between the old and new forces.
Now, let’s look at the data. ETH is currently stuck in a liquidation cluster exceeding $1.3 billion, with both bulls and bears squeezed together—a small move could trigger a chain of liquidations. If you still dare to add leverage at this point, you must have a strong heart. Pal also warned earlier: don’t play too aggressively.
There’s also been a strange incident recently—MEME coin PEPE’s official website was hacked. Even though MEME coins are high-risk to begin with, this incident has poured cold water on the market. Even more surprising, some have observed that VCs are starting to use traditional financial metrics like “price-to-sales ratio” to evaluate crypto assets. This kind of overly rational behavior often signals that sentiment has hit rock bottom.
So, the current situation is highly divided:
On the surface, big players are painting grand liquidity blueprints;
Within the industry, supporters of old and new assets are still debating fundamental logic;
On the charts, high leverage, security vulnerabilities, and extreme pessimism are intertwined.
Historically, those truly major cycles never start smoothly amidst cheers. They always take shape slowly in the midst of chaos, division, and repeated testing.
What do you think? Is this the “mid-bull correction” Pal mentioned, or is it an even more complex phase? Share your thoughts in the comments.