We've put community ahead of profit. Simple as that.



Refunds? We've processed them in bulk. The Kaito Round situation—$700K returned to users. Puzzles in-app purchases? Same story. We're literally handing back revenue streams that most platforms would pocket without a second thought.

But here's the reality check: there's a razor-thin boundary between being community-first and running an unsustainable operation. We're walking that line every day. Giving back feels right, but it can't be reckless. Balancing user trust with long-term viability isn't just philosophy—it's survival math for any Web3 project trying to do things differently.
KAITO-2.73%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PonziDetectorvip
· 6h ago
Did they really refund $700,000? It's rare to see such a solid project these days, but we'll have to see how long they can keep it up.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTaxvip
· 12-06 02:08
Taking 700,000 back to the community is definitely a bold move. But sustainability is easier said than done.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapistvip
· 12-05 09:21
NGL, this kind of talk sounds nice, but how long can it really last...
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivatorvip
· 12-04 19:53
700K has already been refunded, that's a pretty ruthless move. But to be honest, not going bankrupt is what truly means community first, right?
View OriginalReply0
TerraNeverForgetvip
· 12-04 19:52
But seriously, can we really keep our footing on this boundary? Feels like it could all go wrong in the next second.
View OriginalReply0
BearEatsAllvip
· 12-04 19:52
NGL, this move is pretty impressive—just refunding 700,000 like that. But it does feel a bit too idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeatervip
· 12-04 19:48
$700,000 refund? Sounds like they're cleaning up the mess for retail investors trapped in a liquidity pit, but there has to be a limit to everything. Can they really survive until next year if this keeps up?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 12-04 19:44
Is it true? 700k has all been refunded? How can you do business like this... But honestly, it's rare to see a project that can actually do this. I'm just worried that one day they really won't be able to keep it up.
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 12-04 19:42
Is it for real, 700k refunded directly? Are there still projects like this these days? It's not that I'm overthinking, it's just that I've seen too many shitcoins... But let's wait and see—if it can actually survive this cycle, then we'll talk.
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCriticvip
· 12-04 19:39
It sounds nice to say "community first," but at the end of the day, survival comes first. A $700,000 refund may sound righteous, but what percentage is that of the total revenue? The real issue isn't the refund itself, but whether the project's tokenomics can withstand this kind of "generosity"...
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)