Recently, I’ve seen people analyzing ZEC, saying things like “After regulatory risks are mitigated, it can rise to 510”?
Wait a minute, am I understanding this correctly—the core of privacy coins is privacy, right? And now you’re telling me we need to accept regulation for the price to go up? Then what’s the point of privacy? Might as well just rename it “Transparent Coin.”
This logic is like a bulletproof vest seller saying, “As long as bullets can’t penetrate it, this vest is valuable.” Isn’t that just stating the obvious? The market can’t find anything to hype now, so they start making up stories like “privacy coins being regulated is a good thing”? I find it absurd just typing this out.
ZEC has dropped from 300, and it’s nowhere near recovering. Honestly, it sitting in the double digits is probably more realistic. If nothing else, this kind of self-contradictory narrative is a joke in itself—you want both regulation and privacy, wanting to have your cake and eat it too? Wake up.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVEye
· 12-05 13:47
This logic is really absurd. If privacy coins are to be regulated, then what's the point of privacy? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSociety
· 12-04 16:39
Ha, this logic is really something. Privacy coins need regulation in order to rise? Isn’t that a self-defeating narrative?
They really want to have their cake and eat it too, hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
LightningAllInHero
· 12-04 16:29
Haha, this logic is really insane. Privacy coins need regulation? Then what's the point?
Everyone really wants to have their cake and eat it too.
This narrative is just ridiculous.
Reminds me of someone arguing with me about this before, and in the end, they just completely lost it.
ZEC should just take a break, there’s no story left.
Recently, I’ve seen people analyzing ZEC, saying things like “After regulatory risks are mitigated, it can rise to 510”?
Wait a minute, am I understanding this correctly—the core of privacy coins is privacy, right? And now you’re telling me we need to accept regulation for the price to go up? Then what’s the point of privacy? Might as well just rename it “Transparent Coin.”
This logic is like a bulletproof vest seller saying, “As long as bullets can’t penetrate it, this vest is valuable.” Isn’t that just stating the obvious? The market can’t find anything to hype now, so they start making up stories like “privacy coins being regulated is a good thing”? I find it absurd just typing this out.
ZEC has dropped from 300, and it’s nowhere near recovering. Honestly, it sitting in the double digits is probably more realistic. If nothing else, this kind of self-contradictory narrative is a joke in itself—you want both regulation and privacy, wanting to have your cake and eat it too? Wake up.