CoinVoice has recently learned that Paradigm researcher Dan Robinson stated on social media that whether or not a sorter is decentralized is not the most important factor; the key lies in the rules it follows and whether it will use its power to harm user interests or engage in value extraction. He pointed out that decentralized sorters can also be extractive, while centralized sorters can also be non-extractive.
For layer two networks, the long-term resistance to censorship and activity mainly comes from layer one networks. The attributes of the sorter (including resistance to censorship, transaction pool privacy, and sorting rules, etc.) are the most important considerations; "Decentralization" itself cannot fully define the nature of a sorter.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
CoinVoice has recently learned that Paradigm researcher Dan Robinson stated on social media that whether or not a sorter is decentralized is not the most important factor; the key lies in the rules it follows and whether it will use its power to harm user interests or engage in value extraction. He pointed out that decentralized sorters can also be extractive, while centralized sorters can also be non-extractive.
For layer two networks, the long-term resistance to censorship and activity mainly comes from layer one networks. The attributes of the sorter (including resistance to censorship, transaction pool privacy, and sorting rules, etc.) are the most important considerations; "Decentralization" itself cannot fully define the nature of a sorter.