Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Do you know what the most frustrating thing is? I didn’t misread the direction yesterday; I got wrecked by my own sloppy order placement rhythm... I thought “just eat it all at once,” but the depth of the pool couldn’t handle it at all. I even set a relatively large slippage tolerance, and the moment the trade executed, it was instantly broken through. Looking back, the average transaction price was completely different from what I had in mind.
After reviewing, there are just two points: first, don’t equate “can execute” with “good execution.” When the depth isn’t enough, raising the slippage tolerance is essentially just giving away money proactively; second, don’t place all your orders in one big chunk—split them into several parts, spread them out over time, at least avoid becoming a liquidity ATM in others’ eyes.
Recently, everyone’s been talking about AI Agents for automated trading and on-chain interactions. Honestly, that’s just storytelling; no one’s paying attention to safety and execution details. If automation doesn’t even care about slippage, depth, or order splitting, then it’s just outsourcing your “impulse” to a script. Anyway, I’ll just lower my slippage tolerance a bit—better not to execute than to become a lesson again.