Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I've seen a bunch of RWA on-chain projects promoting "on-chain liquidity," but honestly, I find it a bit hard to believe... Being able to match orders on-chain doesn't mean you can redeem at any time; the key is the redemption terms: T+ how many? Queueing mechanism? Who has priority? Is there a gate during a run on the bank? If these aren't clearly specified, liquidity just looks like a visual effect.
What's even more amusing is that L2 is still arguing over TPS, fees, and who provides bigger subsidies, but if the underlying assets are slow to redeem or can even be paused, then no matter how fast the chain is, it's just moving the "waiting" onto the chain. In DAO proposals, I can be late, but I don't want to be late for redemption.
First, review the redemption terms of a few RWA projects I hold, and meanwhile, revoke any old authorizations that can be withdrawn.