Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Tensions over cryptocurrency regulation in Washington are intensifying. In his latest statement before the Senate, Treasury Secretary Bessent went directly after the industry’s “nihilist” groups—referring to those who want absolutely no rules. As I listened, I realized this isn’t just a political fight, but a clash that will shape the market’s future.
Bessent’s remarks were blunt: “There is a group in the industry that prefers no regulation at all.” The comments from the Senate Banking Committee came especially after major players—like Coinbase—had rallied behind the proposed bill. Industry representatives are currently voicing serious concerns about DeFi regulation, stablecoin yields, and token definitions.
What’s interesting here is Mark Warner’s reaction. The Democratic senator immediately chimed in with “Amen, brother.” Warner stressed that there are major gaps in DeFi and national security and said these issues need to be addressed in the bill. Even during the hearing, he joked, “I feel like I’m in crypto hell,” but the message was clear—these are issues that must be taken seriously.
For the bill to pass, both sides must reach a compromise. Democrats like Alsobrooks are optimistic that a bipartisan agreement can be reached. Bessent said the industry can’t move forward without the bill—an extremely strong statement.
Another dimension is the China factor. Lummis asked whether China is developing digital asset systems. Bessent said China could build a system based on the yuan or one backed by gold. This is directly tied to concerns about maintaining U.S. financial leadership. As for CBDCs and government-linked tokens, he believes the U.S.’s own private stablecoins would be more advantageous.
In conclusion, this debate is critical not only for the crypto industry, but also for global financial competition. The answer to whether the yuan is worth investing in is closely connected to these dynamics—no matter how the U.S. shapes its own digital-asset framework, it will have to compete in global markets. Within this year, the bill is expected to pass the Senate, and that passage will determine the U.S. crypto strategy.