2025-12-26 18:25:49

A new algorithmic approach has recently gained attention. Its core idea is quite interesting—abandoning the old routine of simply looking at follower counts and engagement metrics, and instead digging deeper into the true contribution value behind the account.

This evaluation system considers several dimensions: the actual behavior patterns of the account, the quality of user-content interactions, and the ultimate real influence generated. In other words, it can identify accounts that rely on spamming and buying followers to artificially inflate data, while shining a spotlight on those that truly create value and have a real impact.

This is highly significant for the community. Many previous metrics were easily gamed, but this new approach makes false growth impossible to hide. If you want to establish genuine influence in the Web3 community, the key is to focus on content quality itself, rather than blindly piling up numbers.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LightningWallet

· 3h ago

It was about time to have such a mechanism. The accounts that buy followers will finally be exposed haha --- Authentic influence > Fake numbers. That's true, but the people who say it are often those with good-looking numbers --- Wow, finally someone is taking real action. The spam accounts are trembling --- Quality assessment? Sounds good... Just not sure how the standards are set, and hopefully there’s no backdoor manipulation --- Damn, now those spam accounts must be panicking --- Sounds nice, but in the end, everything is decided by human factors --- I just want to know how this system judges "real value." Feels like there’s still room for manipulation

View OriginalReply0

RooftopVIP

· 3h ago

Finally, someone is doing this. It was about time to cut off those spam accounts buying followers to inflate data. Genuine influence > Fake follower count. This is the right way. If this algorithm really works, Web3 would be so much cleaner. Oh my, those spam bots used to bother me to death every day. Reliable projects will eventually surface, and trash will naturally sink. Content is king—it's been said for so many years. Hopefully, this time it will truly come true.

View OriginalReply0

PriceOracleFairy

· 3h ago

finally someone's talking about dismantling the vanity metrics racket... been watching these price deviation patterns in follower counts for months ngl

Reply0

VibesOverCharts

· 4h ago

Finally, someone is doing this. I'm really tired of looking at that pile of brushes.

View OriginalReply0

hodl_therapist

· 4h ago

Really, someone finally understands. The accounts that buy followers should be shut down. Wow, does this mean the fake prosperity is about to be exposed? I support it. Another "real value" framework... can it really identify bots? Let's hear it. It should have been like this a long time ago; quality > numbers, everyone who understands knows. The key is still how good the execution is; this isn't the first time I've heard this argument. This is what Web3 should look like; brothers, stop just focusing on data. Sounds good, but with so many tricks to flood the screen, can it really be prevented? No matter how smart the algorithm is, it's still easy to bypass... I think. Actual influence is the key; finally, someone dares to say it. Shared it, this must be known by more people.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e19e9c10

· 4h ago

Finally someone is doing this, after being overwhelmed by those spam accounts for so long --- That's right, quality > quantity, but in reality, many people are still competing for follower counts... --- Hmm... sounds good, but I don't know how it will work in practice --- This is the way it should be; the old metrics system should have been scrapped long ago --- Interesting, what about those big accounts? --- Damn, now we can finally tell who's just blowing smoke and who's got real stuff --- Quality first? But I think many people just want big numbers for quick cash... --- If this system can really stick around, it will be a win; the key is to prevent new gamification methods from emerging --- Focusing on content is a good point, but it's really hard

View OriginalReply0