Some people always ask: Is it still possible to get in now?
If you look at the calendar, you'll notice that 68 days before the Fed stopped balance sheet reduction in 2019, Bitcoin peaked and pulled back. But what happened after that? Once the liquidity floodgates opened, the entire following year was a period of explosive, unstoppable growth.
Now look at 2025—56 days before QT ends, BTC once again hit a local high. History doesn’t simply repeat itself, but it often rhymes. Short-term volatility is inevitable, but these cyclical liquidity shifts often hide real windows of opportunity.
Speaking of potential plays, do you remember those meme coins that took off last year? WIF surged to nearly $5 billion market cap after tokenization, and POPCAT reached $2 billion. Now there’s a bread cat called INBRED. Its on-chain data across various networks actually rivals theirs, but its market cap is still sitting at just a few hundred thousand dollars.
Such an asymmetric valuation gap means either the market hasn’t discovered it yet, or there’s something wrong with the project itself. If it’s the former, what would happen if you started accumulating in batches now? I’ll leave that for you to judge.
After all, those who truly know how to play the game never chase at the top—they quietly accumulate when no one is paying attention, and soar when the winds finally come.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenCreatorOP
· 17h ago
Hmm... I’ve looked into INBRED as well. The data does seem legit, but for some reason it still feels a bit weird to me.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapist
· 19h ago
Ah, it's that soul-searching moment of "Is it still a good time to get in?" again. Guys, it's time to wake up.
I've heard the "history rhymes" argument too many times. The question is, do you dare to bet?
INBRED... sure, the on-chain data looks good, but who can guarantee it won't be the next one to go to zero?
My advice is to read fewer of these "hidden opportunity" articles. Look in the mirror and ask yourself how many zeros you can handle.
View OriginalReply0
StableBoi
· 12-07 04:26
I've heard the saying that history rhymes many times, but the 56 days vs 68 days comparison is indeed interesting. As for INBRED... I'll keep watching for now, just in case I step on a landmine.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 12-05 23:51
Wait, does INBRED really have data that's on par with WIF? It feels like another pump-and-dump scheme to me...
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 12-05 23:49
History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes. This time, it might really be different.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavant
· 12-05 23:41
ngl the INBRED thesis is giving peak asymmetric upside energy but like... have u actually checked the contract audit situation or we just vibing on hopium rn
Reply0
DAOplomacy
· 12-05 23:40
ngl the "history rhymes" playbook gets recycled every cycle... but yeah, the macro setup here is arguably non-trivial. those meme valuations pre-hype vs post-hype reveal some pretty sub-optimal incentive structures in discovery mechanisms, if we're being honest about it
Some people always ask: Is it still possible to get in now?
If you look at the calendar, you'll notice that 68 days before the Fed stopped balance sheet reduction in 2019, Bitcoin peaked and pulled back. But what happened after that? Once the liquidity floodgates opened, the entire following year was a period of explosive, unstoppable growth.
Now look at 2025—56 days before QT ends, BTC once again hit a local high. History doesn’t simply repeat itself, but it often rhymes. Short-term volatility is inevitable, but these cyclical liquidity shifts often hide real windows of opportunity.
Speaking of potential plays, do you remember those meme coins that took off last year? WIF surged to nearly $5 billion market cap after tokenization, and POPCAT reached $2 billion. Now there’s a bread cat called INBRED. Its on-chain data across various networks actually rivals theirs, but its market cap is still sitting at just a few hundred thousand dollars.
Such an asymmetric valuation gap means either the market hasn’t discovered it yet, or there’s something wrong with the project itself. If it’s the former, what would happen if you started accumulating in batches now? I’ll leave that for you to judge.
After all, those who truly know how to play the game never chase at the top—they quietly accumulate when no one is paying attention, and soar when the winds finally come.