Recently, I've seen a bunch of "delegated voting" promotions again, claiming to save small investors trouble. Basically, it's just about consolidating votes into a few big accounts for easier management. Who exactly is governance tokens really governing... Sometimes the proposal content is quite complex, and I’m too lazy to read each one. Delegating away also risks turning into an oligarch club, so in the end, it's still people like me with fragmented holdings who are responsible for maintaining a "decentralized atmosphere."

Layer 2 is always arguing about TPS, fees, and subsidies every day, making a lot of noise. But when it comes to governance voting, many times it’s just whoever has more resources and a louder voice.

Why am I so calm: it’s a small habit—before delegating, I first check what the delegate has voted on before, and how closely they are related to certain projects. If I spend ten minutes and still don’t understand, I won’t vote... Anyway, missing out once won’t kill me.