Have we witnessed the first case of a Layer 3 solution actually downgrading to Layer 1? Hyperliquid's architecture shift raises questions about scalability trade-offs and design philosophy in blockchain infrastructure.

HYPE-6.86%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CexIsBadvip
· 11h ago
L3 downgraded to L1? Isn't this just a compromise? What happened to the promised infinite scalability...
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlicevip
· 23h ago
This move by Hyperliquid is really outrageous... What happened to the promised L3? They just cut it back to L1? Isn't this basically admitting that their scaling solution has issues?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Brovip
· 23h ago
Damn, is Hyperliquid doing a complete reversal here? Downgrading from L3 to L1—doesn't this totally contradict their original design philosophy...
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmarevip
· 23h ago
This move by Hyperliquid is honestly a bit ridiculous—downgrading L3 to L1? Are they just messing around…
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)