The founder of the Zama project truly has a very forward-looking vision. Several years ago, their team made a bold decision—to build their protocol directly to 128-bit security level, and it’s even quantum-resistant.



Although this approach would definitely impact performance, they still insisted on doing it. Looking back now, this early move towards quantum security really put them ahead in the entire crypto industry. After all, the threat of quantum computing isn’t imminent, but if you wait until it happens to take action, it’ll be too late.

That’s how it is with technical route choices sometimes. You might have to sacrifice some efficiency in the short term, but long-term security is the foundation for a protocol’s survival.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ZenChainWalkervip
· 4h ago
To be honest, Zama's move this time is truly visionary. The combination of 128-bit + quantum resistance must have been criticized by many for poor performance at first, but looking at it now, it really is a solid choice.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnReadvip
· 12-08 00:24
128-bit quantum resistance? Alright, anyway, no one can really tell if it's actually useful right now.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgagevip
· 12-07 11:59
To be honest, Zama's move is indeed smart. No one else has dared to use this combination of 128-bit + quantum resistance.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmivip
· 12-07 11:59
Quantum security is indeed seriously underestimated. Most projects are betting that the quantum threat is still N years away. Zama is really bold to take the plunge this time.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBotvip
· 12-07 11:59
This quantum-safe approach is indeed highly forward-looking, but who will solve the performance issues?
View OriginalReply0
RugDocScientistvip
· 12-07 11:59
Wait, is this really worth it? What if the performance tanks, how are we supposed to manage?
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretfulvip
· 12-07 11:53
Haha, Zama's move this time is indeed something, but to be honest, with such poor performance, can it really survive until the quantum era?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmesvip
· 12-07 11:46
128-bit quantum-resistant? This guy is really thinking long-term, but the poor performance is a bit painful.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePuddingvip
· 12-07 11:36
To be honest, Zama’s move this time is a typical “I’m not here for quick money” attitude, which is quite rare. Most teams are just stalling when it comes to quantum security, but Zama went straight for 128-bit... That mindset is definitely different.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)