There's a question worth discussing: are these two approaches actually the same thing? On one hand, you have hype driven by some inside information, and on the other, concepts that gain traction purely through social media buzz. Honestly, is there really any solid evidence for the former?



As for the BSC chain, what it lacks most right now isn't the number of projects, but a truly breakout narrative that can go mainstream. Instead of having 50 small projects each with a $2 million market cap, it would be better to focus resources on incubating a flagship project that can reach a $100 million market cap. If funds keep getting scattered, how can the ecosystem possibly take off? Isn't this a classic case of traffic diversion!
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
gm_or_ngmivip
· 4h ago
Narratives are ultimately more valuable than insider information.
View OriginalReply0
fren.ethvip
· 12-07 10:52
Everything comes down to the narrative.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon42vip
· 12-07 10:46
What's the difference in hype?
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrincevip
· 12-07 10:45
Bearish on the BSC ecosystem
View OriginalReply0
SudoRm-RfWallet/vip
· 12-07 10:35
The grand narrative relies on flagship projects.
View OriginalReply0
DaoGovernanceOfficervip
· 12-07 10:32
Value drives growth
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)