There's a question worth discussing: are these two approaches actually the same thing? On one hand, you have hype driven by some inside information, and on the other, concepts that gain traction purely through social media buzz. Honestly, is there really any solid evidence for the former?
As for the BSC chain, what it lacks most right now isn't the number of projects, but a truly breakout narrative that can go mainstream. Instead of having 50 small projects each with a $2 million market cap, it would be better to focus resources on incubating a flagship project that can reach a $100 million market cap. If funds keep getting scattered, how can the ecosystem possibly take off? Isn't this a classic case of traffic diversion!
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
gm_or_ngmi
· 4h ago
Narratives are ultimately more valuable than insider information.
There's a question worth discussing: are these two approaches actually the same thing? On one hand, you have hype driven by some inside information, and on the other, concepts that gain traction purely through social media buzz. Honestly, is there really any solid evidence for the former?
As for the BSC chain, what it lacks most right now isn't the number of projects, but a truly breakout narrative that can go mainstream. Instead of having 50 small projects each with a $2 million market cap, it would be better to focus resources on incubating a flagship project that can reach a $100 million market cap. If funds keep getting scattered, how can the ecosystem possibly take off? Isn't this a classic case of traffic diversion!