$BTC 's situation is a bit absurd right now.



The new SEC chairman just gave Bitcoin the strongest endorsement ever—calling it the "cornerstone of global finance's future." Two years ago, no one would have dared imagine such a statement. The signal that the traditional financial system is about to change is already clear enough. But before the market could even digest this wave of good news, top Silicon Valley VC a16z dropped a heavy blow: quantum computing might break through Bitcoin's current cryptographic system, and if it doesn't upgrade quickly, the consequences are unpredictable.

Two extremes are appearing at the same time. Officially, there's unprecedented support, yet on the technical side, alarm bells are ringing. Even more surreal is the mining cost—right now, it takes $137,800 to mine one Bitcoin, which is more expensive than the market price. Why are miners still doing it? Because they're betting on the future, betting that this thing can truly reshape financial rules. Just look at the real-world context: US housing prices have crushed young people's hopes, economic nihilism is spreading, and Bitcoin has risen 122% in a year. For many, it's not an investment—it's the only lifeline they can grab.

But the quantum threat isn't science fiction. Bitcoin's upgrade mechanism is notoriously slow, and a hard fork could split the community. What's worse are those old addresses that have been dormant for years—millions of Bitcoins are sitting in early wallets whose owners may have long lost contact. These coins are unlikely to proactively upgrade their defenses. Once quantum computers reach the tipping point, these addresses could be hacked en masse, triggering disastrous chain reactions.

Bitcoin is now at a crossroads: either it becomes the infrastructure of the new financial system, or it dies suddenly amid technological leaps. The SEC's statement has given it wings, but a16z's warning has started the countdown. Miners are mining at a loss, young people are making desperate bets, and quantum computers are advancing rapidly in labs... The climax of this drama hasn't arrived yet.

Can it outrun time?
BTC3.69%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SoliditySurvivorvip
· 13h ago
Ha, a16z starts to scare people as soon as the SEC gives its endorsement? Seen this trick too many times, it's just another layer of FUD. Even if quantum computing really arrives, it will still take years. What's the rush now? Bitcoin isn't that fragile. Mining cost is $137,800? That's the current situation. If the price really skyrockets, it won't be a loss. Miners are all gamblers, you know? Dormant coins are indeed a risk, but this is not a newly discovered problem. The upgrade mechanism is slow, but not slow enough to be fatal. That's just how Bitcoin is, always at a crossroads. In fact, this kind of uncertainty is what makes it interesting. Outrun time? It's already been running for more than a decade.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatchervip
· 12-08 09:48
To be honest, this move is pretty surreal. One side calls it the cornerstone, the other says it’s over, and the market is just stuck in the middle... It costs $137,800 to mine one coin—miners must have nerves of steel. It’s really a life-or-death gamble.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 12-08 08:30
It's really absurd—on one hand, the SEC is singing praises, and on the other, quantum computing is sharpening its knife. Isn't this like giving BTC both a blessing and a death notice at the same time?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDeniedvip
· 12-07 04:55
Mining cost is 137,800? That's even higher than the current price? These miners must be doing charity work... Anyone with a bit of rationality should have left by now.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9f682d4cvip
· 12-07 04:54
To be honest, I'm a bit confused by this logic. While the SEC is praising it, a16z is talking about a quantum crisis—isn't this just giving candy with one hand and wielding a knife with the other... Miners keep mining at a loss and are still holding on. Is it true belief, or are they so deeply stuck that they're just gambling blindly now?
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyervip
· 12-07 04:54
Ha, SEC endorsement and quantum threats hitting at the same time—this is just ridiculous. $137,800 to mine one coin? Miners really are betting it all. A 122% increase in a year is enough to be a lifesaver. Who still trusts the Fed when it comes to housing prices? The real fear is those old wallets suddenly getting cracked by quantum in seconds—if that happens, the entire confidence system will collapse.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegenvip
· 12-07 04:49
ngl the quantum thing lowkey terrifies me more than i'd admit to my hodling group chat tbh
Reply0
ChainSpyvip
· 12-07 04:33
Honestly, the script is just too brilliant. On one side, the SEC is handing out candy, and on the other, a16z is chanting a tightening spell—Bitcoin is just stuck in the middle. I still somewhat believe in the quantum thing, but as for those old coin addresses... to be honest, they've been dormant for so long that if something really happens, it won't be us who are heartbroken. Those guys who keep mining at a loss are truly gambling with their lives.
View OriginalReply0
StableBoivip
· 12-07 04:32
So it's really like playing Russian roulette—on one hand, the SEC calls it the cornerstone of the future, and on the other, there's a countdown to a quantum threat... It's just surreal, man.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictimvip
· 12-07 04:26
Damn, this is the crypto world—one side is heaven, the other is hell... I really didn't expect miners to still be mining at a loss.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)