Cross-chain transactions still feel janky because we're stuck using outdated bridge-focused infrastructure.



That's what makes MultichainZ's omnichain credit engine interesting—it actually rethinks how things work. You can lock up collateral on one chain and take out loans on a completely different one. No more shuffling assets back and forth just to access liquidity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LucidSleepwalkervip
· 7h ago
The logic behind cross-chain lending is indeed different, but can it really be realized?
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChainvip
· 14h ago
This logic seems a bit convoluted. Is it really safe to have collateral and loans on different chains?
View OriginalReply0
SatsStackingvip
· 14h ago
Cross-chain is really annoying, every time I have to move assets back and forth. MultichainZ's approach is indeed different.
View OriginalReply0
staking_grampsvip
· 14h ago
Hmm... Someone is finally taking cross-chain lending seriously, but let's wait and see how it actually performs in practice.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHerovip
· 14h ago
Cross-chain really has always been a major headache. This MultichainZ omnichain credit engine sounds pretty impressive—finally, no more shuffling assets back and forth.
View OriginalReply0
MidsommarWalletvip
· 14h ago
Cross-chain lending is indeed convenient, but I'm still worried about the stability of this system.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)