Been watching the top 100 $GAIN holders and noticed something weird—a bunch of suspected project team sockpuppets are frantically dumping.



Their dumping methods are all over the place: some go for direct, bold moves dumping thousands of USDT at once, while others take the “ant moving” approach, selling off a few USDT at a time. What’s even more outrageous is the shuffling between addresses—A address transfers to B, then splits into smaller orders and lists them, clearly trying to use volume to mask their real intentions.

Bottom line, as long as the minting privilege isn’t revoked and the burn plan isn’t implemented, this thing is a bottomless pit. Getting in now is basically giving free money to the project team. And that so-called “hacker attack”? At its core, it’s no different from what the team is doing themselves—both are printing unlimited tokens. The only difference is the hacker drains it all at once, while the team does it slowly like boiling a frog.

If you understand, make your own judgment. I’m just warning anyone who’ll listen. On-chain data doesn’t lie—check the holder changes yourself and you’ll see just how deep this rabbit hole goes.
GAIN0.8%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullSurvivorvip
· 3h ago
The boiling frog metaphor is spot on—it's even more disgusting than a hacker's rug pull. --- Here we go again. Check the top holders and it's all alt accounts shuffling tokens. I knew nothing good was going on. --- If the minting rights aren't revoked, don't touch it. That's a lesson I learned the hard way. --- The on-chain data is right there. Who are you trying to fool? I've been watching for a while. --- Dumping a few thousand U all at once? That's just blatant, lol. --- I'm tired of these unlimited money-printing games. Wake up, everyone. --- Shuffling between addresses, scattered sell orders—anyone can see what's going on. It's so amateurish. --- The burn plan is always scheduled for next year. It's ridiculous if I believe you guys.
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluffvip
· 15h ago
Same old trick, already tired of seeing it. --- The "boiling frog" metaphor is spot on, that's exactly how these projects operate. --- Checked the address, it's really outrageous—smurf accounts dumping like it's raining. --- I really can't touch tokens without minting rights revoked, it's just too unsettling. --- You're right, on-chain data doesn't lie, but how many people actually listen to advice? --- This round of dumping is pretty intense, feels like it's about to break. --- The only difference between hackers and project teams is this? Then I'd rather pick the hacker—at least they're straightforward. --- Are those top holders on the leaderboard real or not? Can't even tell anymore. --- "Bottomless pit" is the perfect term—so many people still trying to catch the bottom, that's bold. --- I just want to know when this token is going to zero—let's get it over with.
View OriginalReply0
GasWranglervip
· 15h ago
nah if you actually analyze the mempool data on those addresses, the pattern is demonstrably just classic rug mechanics... technically speaking, those mint functions staying open is the real red flag tbh
Reply0
FOMOSapienvip
· 15h ago
Same old trick, already sick of it. The real culprit is the minting permission. Already knew it, shuffling addresses is way too obvious, just waiting for the newbies to jump in. Not touching it, I'd rather miss out than get dumped on. On-chain data is crystal clear. Boiling frogs slowly is truly ruthless, might as well just cut to the chase. These kinds of projects are all the same at their core, just old tricks in new packaging. Just betting that they'll disable the minting permission, but the odds are slim.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffetvip
· 15h ago
Already saw through it long ago, the address shuffling trick is overplayed and worn out. The "boiling frog in warm water" analogy is spot on, really. If you don't understand on-chain data, don't get involved—you'll definitely lose this round. If the minting rights aren't revoked, I won't fall for it again. Look at the top holders list, those addresses are obviously from the same group—it's ridiculous. Giving money to the project team is worse than throwing it down the drain. A hacker attack is no different from them sabotaging it themselves—well said. Ant-like gradual selling, the attention to detail is just too good, huh. Whether you want advice or not is up to you, the data speaks for itself.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580vip
· 15h ago
The data shows that this gameplay is already everywhere. Still, as long as the minting authority remains open, just forget about it—it's bound to collapse eventually.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_brokevip
· 15h ago
It’s the same old trick again. I’ve seen plenty of “boiling frogs in warm water” situations like this. You can really tell by looking at the holdings leaderboard—those fragmented sell-offs are just absurd.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)