So the EU just hit a certain platform with a €120 million penalty over their blue checkmark system. Interesting move.
But here's what's bugging me: Meta runs the exact same paid verification game across their platforms. Same concept, same blue badge, same monetization strategy. Yet... crickets from regulators?
Is there something different about how these verification systems operate under the hood? Or are we watching selective enforcement play out in real-time? The inconsistency here raises some serious questions about how platform governance rules actually get applied.
Anyone else noticing this pattern? 👀
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashBrownies
· 15h ago
Selective enforcement by regulators is truly outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 16h ago
Double standards in regulation are really ugly.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddy
· 16h ago
Let’s deal with the double standard dogs together.
So the EU just hit a certain platform with a €120 million penalty over their blue checkmark system. Interesting move.
But here's what's bugging me: Meta runs the exact same paid verification game across their platforms. Same concept, same blue badge, same monetization strategy. Yet... crickets from regulators?
Is there something different about how these verification systems operate under the hood? Or are we watching selective enforcement play out in real-time? The inconsistency here raises some serious questions about how platform governance rules actually get applied.
Anyone else noticing this pattern? 👀