So the EU just hit a certain platform with a €120 million penalty over their blue checkmark system. Interesting move.



But here's what's bugging me: Meta runs the exact same paid verification game across their platforms. Same concept, same blue badge, same monetization strategy. Yet... crickets from regulators?

Is there something different about how these verification systems operate under the hood? Or are we watching selective enforcement play out in real-time? The inconsistency here raises some serious questions about how platform governance rules actually get applied.

Anyone else noticing this pattern? 👀
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HashBrowniesvip
· 15h ago
Selective enforcement by regulators is truly outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoastervip
· 16h ago
Double standards in regulation are really ugly.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddyvip
· 16h ago
Let’s deal with the double standard dogs together.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassinvip
· 16h ago
Regulation is really interesting.
View OriginalReply0
ThesisInvestorvip
· 16h ago
Isn't the regulation too double-standard?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)