A notable policy voice recently pushed back against rigid regulatory constraints. The argument? Avoid setting artificial ceilings or basements that limit policy flexibility. This perspective reflects ongoing debates about how much structure versus adaptability economic frameworks should have. When policymakers box themselves in with hard limits, they risk losing the maneuverability needed during market turbulence or unexpected shifts. The core message here challenges the one-size-fits-all approach, advocating instead for adaptive guardrails rather than concrete barriers.