Recently, I came across an interesting perspective—the global battle for financial discourse power, where stablecoins and central bank digital currencies are actually an under-the-table contest.
The reality is harsh: USD stablecoins have already monopolized the track. Other fiat currencies trying to issue stablecoins? Basically, there's no way out. The US legal framework may seem like it's digging its own grave, but they still manage to maintain tight control.
Some suggest issuing a RMB stablecoin to counterbalance? Wishful thinking. Not only does it lack advantages, but it could also undermine monetary sovereignty and plant landmines for financial security. Not to mention the stablecoin and virtual currency systems have too many cross-border money laundering and fraud cases—the risk exposure is frighteningly high.
But from another angle, we do have some cards to play. In mobile payments, we lead globally, and the digital RMB is progressing solidly. Rather than following the path of USD stablecoins, it’s better to focus on central bank digital currency—this is the track where we can truly seize the initiative.
To put it bluntly, whoever leads the rules for digital currency in the future will hold the key to the next generation of financial order. Behind the stablecoin battle lies a deeper contest over monetary sovereignty.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketHustler
· 3h ago
USD stablecoins are truly unbeatable; other currencies don't stand a chance.
Honestly, our path with central bank digital currency (CBDC) is the right one—much smarter than going head-to-head with stablecoins.
The risk of money laundering is indeed frightening; the stablecoin system will have to be reined in sooner or later.
Our lead in mobile payments is actually the real foundation—CBDC is the true main course.
Instead of fighting for discourse power over stablecoins, it's better to perfect CBDCs and strike from a higher dimension.
Those still all in on stablecoins now have a rather limited vision.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDream
· 12-06 01:52
USD stablecoins have already won big, while we're still figuring out how to counter them—it's a bit awkward.
The path of RMB stablecoins really doesn't seem feasible; it's better to play the central bank digital currency card well.
What's the use of leading in mobile payments if the power to set the rules is still in the hands of those on Wall Street?
At the end of the day, the digital currency game is all about a power struggle between major nations.
Cross-border money laundering is indeed a huge pitfall, and the stablecoin system has too many loopholes.
Central bank digital currency is the real future. The US and Europe are both pushing hard, so we need to keep up.
That's right—whoever controls the rules controls the lifeblood of finance.
The US has already locked in its advantage in this round of the game; we started a bit late.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxiety
· 12-06 01:52
Damn, this analysis is spot on. The US dollar stablecoins are indeed heavily fortified.
---
Central bank digital currency is the real deal; the others are just smoke and mirrors.
---
But the risk part is a bit exaggerated. Different national conditions can't be compared that simply.
---
By the way, does the digital RMB have a chance in cross-border payments? Feels like it's still hard to break through.
---
The US really leaves people speechless with this combo—one thing on the surface, another behind the scenes.
---
Leading in mobile payments? Ha, the global user base isn't that exaggerated.
---
The key is still international acceptance. Technology isn't the problem; politics is.
---
This is a deep game of chess—it'll take ten years to see the real outcome.
---
Why not just go head-to-head? Why bother taking detours with central bank digital currency?
---
Basically, they want to have a say but are afraid of losing money—trying to have it both ways.
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAO
· 12-06 01:46
US dollar stablecoins are so dominant, we shouldn’t follow the trend. Focusing on developing central bank digital currency is the real way forward.
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.eth
· 12-06 01:45
The US dollar stablecoin system has long been locked in, leaving no room for anyone else.
RMB stablecoin? That's a joke, the risk is way too high.
Central bank digital currency is the real way forward, and in this respect, we are indeed ahead.
But honestly, who will ultimately win still depends on how things play out in the future.
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplant
· 12-06 01:44
No one can really break through the iron gate of USD stablecoins; talking about RMB stablecoins is pointless.
The path of central bank digital currency is the only reliable way, and we should stick to it no matter what.
The stablecoin system is already rotten to the core, full of money laundering and scams.
Whoever controls the rules of digital currency will control the future discourse power in finance—it's as simple and direct as that.
The American approach may look like they're digging holes, but it's all calculated moves—they're just playing the game extremely well.
Recently, I came across an interesting perspective—the global battle for financial discourse power, where stablecoins and central bank digital currencies are actually an under-the-table contest.
The reality is harsh: USD stablecoins have already monopolized the track. Other fiat currencies trying to issue stablecoins? Basically, there's no way out. The US legal framework may seem like it's digging its own grave, but they still manage to maintain tight control.
Some suggest issuing a RMB stablecoin to counterbalance? Wishful thinking. Not only does it lack advantages, but it could also undermine monetary sovereignty and plant landmines for financial security. Not to mention the stablecoin and virtual currency systems have too many cross-border money laundering and fraud cases—the risk exposure is frighteningly high.
But from another angle, we do have some cards to play. In mobile payments, we lead globally, and the digital RMB is progressing solidly. Rather than following the path of USD stablecoins, it’s better to focus on central bank digital currency—this is the track where we can truly seize the initiative.
To put it bluntly, whoever leads the rules for digital currency in the future will hold the key to the next generation of financial order. Behind the stablecoin battle lies a deeper contest over monetary sovereignty.