Aave recently passed a major governance proposal to conduct a major cleanup of its V3 multi-chain deployments.



There are two core actions: First, for underperforming chains like Polygon, Gnosis, BNB Chain, and Optimism, the Reserve Factor will be increased (in simple terms, the protocol will charge more fees), and they'll be given a 12-month observation period—if revenue still doesn't improve, Aave may consider pulling out. Second, deployments on zkSync, Metis, and Soneium will be directly cut.

The most aggressive move is the introduction of a hard rule: Want Aave to deploy on a new chain in the future? It must contribute at least $2 million in annual revenue—otherwise, it's off the table.

This actually reflects a trend—DeFi protocols are shifting from "deploy everywhere possible" to "deploy only where there's real revenue." After all, maintaining so many chains isn't cheap, and resources need to be directed toward areas that truly add value. For public chains that already struggle with liquidity, this puts a lot of pressure on them.
AAVE4.04%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HappyToBeDumpedvip
· 12-05 14:54
Ha, now those small public chains really have to think it over. Aave is getting serious this time. A $2 million threshold? Sounds tough, but that's exactly how it should be handled. Finally, a major protocol is starting to care about cost-effectiveness, not just spreading everywhere like in the past two years.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainUndercovervip
· 12-05 14:31
The reality is, chains without returns need to be eliminated—this is the right approach. --- With a $2 million threshold, so many small chains are going to be devastated... --- Aave’s move is ruthless, but to be honest, a cleanup is necessary; otherwise, resources just get wasted. --- Cutting those three chains was the right call; it’s been clear for a while they had no future. --- Switching from casting a wide net to targeted investment—DeFi is finally focusing on efficiency. --- By the way, can Polygon survive the next 12 months? It seems questionable. --- $2 million a year? Most new chains can’t even reach that... --- This is survival of the fittest—only chains with strong tech and lots of users will survive. The rest, goodbye.
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClubvip
· 12-05 14:26
It's alive, Aave has finally woken up. This move is meant to let those trash chains know, if you don’t generate revenue, don’t even think about getting my attention. So true. With a $2 million threshold set, a lot of new chains are just going to be knocked out. Those cut off from zkSync are in an awkward spot now. Polygon and others are being watched—they need to step up or they’ll really get kicked out. Simply put, it used to be about traffic, but now it’s about the profit and loss statement. Chains need to find their own ways to retain users.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)