A top-tier exchange executive recently dropped an interesting take: why would they need middlemen for token listings when they're already sitting on the treasury?



In early December, right after stepping into the co-CEO role, the exec pushed back hard against intermediary rumors in a media chat. The message was crystal clear—direct listing process, no third-party hands in the cookie jar.

Makes you wonder how many other platforms actually operate this way, or if it's just convenient PR talk.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaMisfitvip
· 12-05 12:53
It's the same old rhetoric... Just go with the so-called "transparency," but who would actually believe it?
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 12-05 12:51
Direct listing saves intermediary fees, sounds great, but I'm afraid it's just talk.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000vip
· 12-05 12:29
Direct listing sounds good, but I wonder how long this line can fool people...
View OriginalReply0
HodlAndChillvip
· 12-05 12:26
Sounds nice, but I've heard this line more than once. The key question is: how many exchanges can actually deliver on this?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)