Today I received an interesting notification—the official account of that AI multi-model project suddenly liked a post I made a few days ago. Previously, it was always their Chinese community team maintaining interactions, but this time the official account engaged directly. I guess the team has assigned translators to monitor discussions in different language communities.
This is a good opportunity to talk about their multi-model consensus mechanism. Simply put, it prevents a single AI model from having the final say; instead, multiple models run the same problem simultaneously, and the result is produced through a consensus algorithm. This design actually aligns well with the decentralized approach—lower risk of single points of failure, and theoretically higher credibility of the output. After all, a single model might produce nonsense, but the probability of multiple models hallucinating at the same time is much lower.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
1
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SybilAttackVictim
· 12-05 11:32
An official endorsement makes things interesting.
Multi-model consensus sounds fancy, but can it really be implemented?
It's not unheard of for models to hallucinate together.
I think it still depends on how it actually performs in practice.
Today I received an interesting notification—the official account of that AI multi-model project suddenly liked a post I made a few days ago. Previously, it was always their Chinese community team maintaining interactions, but this time the official account engaged directly. I guess the team has assigned translators to monitor discussions in different language communities.
This is a good opportunity to talk about their multi-model consensus mechanism. Simply put, it prevents a single AI model from having the final say; instead, multiple models run the same problem simultaneously, and the result is produced through a consensus algorithm. This design actually aligns well with the decentralized approach—lower risk of single points of failure, and theoretically higher credibility of the output. After all, a single model might produce nonsense, but the probability of multiple models hallucinating at the same time is much lower.