The old debate's heating up again. Peter Schiff's still throwing punches at Bitcoin, arguing it's got zero backing and nobody really wants it anymore. Meanwhile, CZ fired back with a simple point: millions of folks are actually moving Bitcoin around daily, while that precious gold? Sitting pretty in some vault collecting dust. Two worlds, two visions—one's about everyday utility, the other's about... well, just sitting there. Who's making the stronger case here?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TommyTeacher
· 22h ago
Ha, Schiff is still out there in love with gold, really persistent...
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSeller
· 12-05 08:57
CZ’s move is brilliant—it hits right at the core… Gold just lies in vaults doing nothing, while Bitcoin processes millions of transactions daily. That’s the reality. Schiff’s theories should have been retired long ago.
View OriginalReply0
FromMinerToFarmer
· 12-05 08:56
Hmm... the phrase "gold sitting there collecting dust" really hit me. Schiff's theories have long been outdated.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStation
· 12-05 08:56
Haha, Schiff is still talking it down, so stubborn. Bitcoin's daily average liquidity crushes gold, is there even a debate?
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 12-05 08:50
These two have been arguing for so many years without coming up with anything new. Schiff is just clinging to gold and won't let go—classic "my thing is the best" mentality.
The old debate's heating up again. Peter Schiff's still throwing punches at Bitcoin, arguing it's got zero backing and nobody really wants it anymore. Meanwhile, CZ fired back with a simple point: millions of folks are actually moving Bitcoin around daily, while that precious gold? Sitting pretty in some vault collecting dust. Two worlds, two visions—one's about everyday utility, the other's about... well, just sitting there. Who's making the stronger case here?