2025-12-05 06:30:55

Manual market monitoring too exhausting? I tried building an automated monitoring system with an AI assistant.

The principle is simple—feed the AI a list of key opinion leaders worth following and have it filter information for you 24/7. Now it basically filters out most market noise and only pushes truly valuable updates.

In actual use, the results are pretty good—at least I’m no longer overwhelmed by all kinds of junk info. Getting ahead of the market can sometimes be this simple.

Anyone can actually replicate this setup; the key is whether your monitoring list is solid enough.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

gas_guzzler

· 16h ago

Sounds good, but the key is still having an accurate KOL list. A single trash influencer can ruin everything. --- I’ve thought about this approach too, but I’m worried the info filtered by AI will always be lagging... The real alpha is probably already eaten up by whales. --- It definitely saves time, but I still feel like something’s missing. That sense of urgency from watching the charts is gone, and now I don’t even know what’s going on in the crypto space. --- Damn, finally someone said it. I’ve been manually refreshing Twitter for two months and almost got a work-related illness. I have to try this. --- The problem is, how do you make sure the AI doesn’t get manipulated? All the KOLs are just hyping each other up these days. --- How much does it cost? Are you writing the script yourself or using an off-the-shelf tool? I just want something that gets the job done.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlertBot

· 21h ago

Alright, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. I've been studying this system too. A reliable KOL list is the core; garbage in, garbage out. If I had known monitoring the market was this exhausting, I wouldn't have done it manually. If the list quality is poor, the entire system is useless. The idea is basically to use AI as an information intermediary; the key is your taste.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 12-05 07:01

According to the data, the effectiveness of information filtering systems depends on the quality of the source—based on on-chain data analysis, for every 10% increase in KOL selection accuracy, the false positive rate drops by about 23%. It is worth noting that there are also many risk points involved. Waking up early is indeed beneficial, but only if your list hasn't been compromised. The specific analysis is as follows: First, KOLs themselves may have conflicts of interest; second, the timeliness of AI model training data; third, black swan events can still bypass any filtering mechanism. It’s easy to build such a system, but the challenge lies in continuous iteration and the improvement of risk control mechanisms.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinHunter

· 12-05 06:59

The key is still the quality of the KOL list. In my experience, half of the KOLs are valuable and the other half is just noise... AI filtering information does free you up, but the real money-making opportunities are often hidden in corners it can't reach. Sounds good, but to me it just feels like another way to get led by the nose. I've used this system for two months, and honestly, 80% of the time it's just noise... The crucial thing is whose list it is, bro. Automated monitoring is cool and all, but I'm worried that the good KOLs' insights are already reflected in the price. Are there really any early-bird opportunities left?

View OriginalReply0

NFTPessimist

· 12-05 06:52

Sounds good, but what I’m most worried about is that the so-called “valuable signals” this system filters for you are actually just the harvesting signals from those big KOLs. --- The quality of the KOL list is basically about information asymmetry. Pretty much everyone is following the same few people. --- Automated monitoring sounds great, but have you thought about it? If everyone uses the same list, can the market really move early? --- I still feel like you have to rely on your own judgment. AI is just a tool—garbage in, garbage out. --- I want to try this trick too, but the key is how to tell if a KOL truly has insights or is just pumping their own coin. --- It does save effort, but it feels like something is missing... like those surprise dark horse signals that suddenly pop up. --- Getting ahead of the market is ideal, but in reality, whoever’s network is faster wins, right?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 12-05 06:38

Ha, another one jumping on the AI bandwagon. But to be honest, I’ve tried this monitoring method too—the key really depends on whether the KOLs you pick are aggressive enough. It all comes down to information gaps—knowing just one second earlier can change your fate. Everyone’s competing over this now, whoever has the highest quality list wins. You really have to figure out a way to keep an eye on the market, otherwise it’s exhausting. But that said, sometimes the AI screening still misses dark horses, so you have to stay alert. Anyone can use it, but not everyone can use it right. The key is whether you dare to trust your AI. I still double check things manually sometimes.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHomeless

· 12-05 06:37

Damn, isn't this just information arbitrage? The key is still picking the right people. Here we go, another automated task, but everyone's KOL list is about the same, right? I've known about this trick for a while, the problem is it's too hard to find truly reliable voices. This thing sounds cool, but in practice, you still have to judge for yourself. No matter how good AI is at filtering, it can't save you from trash KOLs. I can't survive without this either; staring at Twitter all day is exhausting.

View OriginalReply0

ChainComedian

· 12-05 06:36

The key is having a high-quality KOL list; otherwise, no matter how smart the AI is, it’s useless. Are those influencers reliable, or are they just here to take advantage of newcomers? Getting information ahead of the market sounds good, but I'm worried about being misled. This approach is great; it saves me from having to stare at the screen late at night. Hey, isn’t this just information arbitrage? Whoever has the better list makes more money.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
282.71K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
87.27K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
14.97K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
13.96K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
16.2K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
HY加油何一
MC:$3.54KHolders:1
0.00%
2
GcashGcash
MC:$3.92KHolders:4
1.87%
3
GHOSTGhost
MC:$3.65KHolders:3
0.53%
4
BONDXBONDX
MC:$3.58KHolders:3
0.00%
5
ICBGIceberg
MC:$10.61KHolders:14
27.06%

Sitemap